Race Concerns in a Free Dixie?

One critique often directed at Southern Nationalists is regarding the South’s historical racial issues – specifically, how can Southern Nationalists create a new Southern government with a large black population? This is an issue brought up not just by hardline White Nationalists but also MAGA conservatives and liberals. Most of the time, this criticism sounds something like this: “You can’t secede because there’s so many black people in the South. They’d never support you or allow such a thing to happen.” This argument usually leans into darker territory, with its advocates suggesting that a new Southern government (or coalition of the Southern states) would be violently toppled by a racial demographic (blacks) that would not adjust or comply within the realm of a Southern Nationalistic polity.

The idea of a successful black counter-revolution against a Dixian government is ignorant given the historical (and even modern) relationship between blacks and Southerners. Many outsiders (particularly Yankees far removed from the South) view the South as akin to Sub-Saharan Africa. In their minds, the entirety of the South looks like the Mississippi Delta, with blacks being an overwhelming majority of the population. In fact, many White Nationalists make wild predictions, or even support the notion, of an emerging black ethnostate in the South, usually in the Deep South. This idea likely stems from the fact that, at one point, blacks were the majority in several, although not all, of the Deep Southern states. During Reconstruction, blacks had a decisive majority in Louisiana, Alabama, Florida, Mississippi and South Carolina.

However, these majorities have slowly but surely decreased over the past 150 years, even to the point where blacks in Mississippi make up only 37% of the population (according to the 2021 Census Bureau). Non-Hispanic Whites make up 56% of the population of Mississippi, with Hispanics approximated about 3.5%. In other words, in the blackest state in America, blacks don’t even have a majority. Next door in Alabama, blacks make up only 26.8% of the total population, whereas the total White population is 68%, more than the total of the United States. In most states, the black total population is either barely growing by decade, decreasing, or stagnating. The total percentage of blacks in the Southern states is only around 20%, 1 out of 5, including the Upper South.

The other idea, of blacks trying to overthrow a Free Dixie, is nonsensical when you realize the lack of independence in the “Southern” negro. Despite a handful of pan-Africans, the majority of supporters of the black ethnostate are blacks living outside the South. Consider the founders of the “New Africa Movement,” they were blacks in Detroit of the Malcolm X Society in the late 1960s. The idea for such an ethnostate has never actually caught on in the South largely due to black indifference to the idea. In reality, most blacks are happy to just get their welfare check from Uncle Sam and then proceed to do their own thing, they aren’t interested in forming an independent state.

Another challenge to the pro-New Africa idea, peddled by misanthropic White Nationalists, is the Southern population in the proposed area of “New Africa.” If we isolate Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia and South Carolina in this black ethnostate, we once again realize blacks only make up around 30% to 36% of the population. On top of this, it’s not like all blacks within these states live exclusively within the “Black Belt;” thus, you have some areas where less than 20% of the population is black (like on the coasts and hill counties). In a collapse scenario of the American Empire, it’s unlikely that blacks, on a strategic and political level, would carve out their independence while demographically outnumbered. Most Southerners are also heavily armed and imbued with a cultural propensity for self-defense.

At the end of the day, it’s clear that blacks are not some invincible obstacle, with respect to Southern sovereignty. From a historical perspective, this is also true. The counter revolt of the Redeemers in the 1870s, which toppled the black-carpetbagger alliance of the Yankee occupiers, is a good example. If blacks could not maintain power with the bayonet, and in black majority states like South Carolina and Mississippi, they certainly can’t manage a modern South where they have no numerical majority outside a few dozen “Black Belt” counties and decaying cities.

In the case of either American collapse or Southern secession, and these two events are not mutually exclusive, blacks in the South will cause tactical/local challenges, but these can be quickly settled. By merely enforcing many of our laws already on the books, the Southern states could easily rein in criminality, disorder, and racial animosity (pushed by race hustlers and the media). This was the norm for most of the “Jim Crow Era,” a period when independent sheriffs, governors, and state militias ensured law and order within Dixie. This is also why Joe Biden never misses an opportunity to demean our old system, note his anti-Bull Connor and Howard University speech. It was this system that effectively made the South such a hardline and orderly society from the 1900s into the 1980s.

When the South is free, either through imperial collapse or securing our own freedom, restoring effective racial systems will not be a concern.

-By Ambrose Cobb

8 comments

  1. I disagree, personally. I believe we should give the blacks control of their own state, and it should encompass the entirety of the northeast Yankeedom. That will solve multiple problems at once.

  2. I seemed to recall way back in the thirties the Communist Party USA floated the idea of making the Black belt region an independent Black nation. But should the Southland Confederation become a reality it must be a majority White nation and in time an all-White nation otherwise the whole process starts over. The upper South is where we should concentrate and those areas of the lower south that are still majority White. It is doubtful the Southland Confederation will be identical to the Confederacy in size or states. The Southland Confederation should also adopt an immigration policy similar to the 1924 Immigration Act. I have traveled much around the world and the Southland Confederation should be a mixture of Orania and Switzerland. Armed neutrality and universal conscription (like Switzerland) because we will need to defend the Confederation and racially homogeneous like Orania but on a much vaster scale. As it stands now, I would advocate universal military training for the Confederation, both male and female, while also opposing the same for the United States because I have no desire to die in some God-forsaken place in order to make the world safe for Democracy. The world is about to enter unsettled reality. Funny how the U.S. can declare war unilaterally without even a declaration of war. If the system won’t follow the Constitution, why should we?

  3. Our globo-homo overlords realize that African Americans will never represent any kind of a serious, organized threat to the status-quo

    Even from our POV, even if Kayne / Ye had successfully convinced 100% of American Blacks of the Jewish angle to our current cultural paradigm, they’re too disorganized, lazy, and unintelligent to ever mount a serious resistance to anything

    Even in today’s warzone urban areas, the only reason Blacks get away with murder (almost always of other Blacks) is because the powers that be allow it to happen. Black inner-city violence could be fairly easily quashed if you just started enforcing the rules already on the books… and after sending in the military into the inner cities

    Blacks are only violent when they’re together in a group. They’ll basically never attack a White guy if its 1-on-1. We’re literally talking about a group of IQ 70-85 people who hold their handguns sideways. Troublemakers within the Black demographic could almost literally be swept up off the streets

    Go watch “The Hurt Locker” and other Iraq War era movies and observe how unintelligent the Arab Iraqis are. Like, these people would literally walk up to US soldiers and try to inquire about something, or start shit, or start yelling at the soldiers if they were coming into their houses to inspect for weapons or whatever. The only reason they presented the issue they did is because America was far too kind in dealing with them and didn’t shoot idiots on sight

    Sorry if my post came off as racist, but everyone knows its literally the truth

  4. If white people don’t quit playing Great White Father, it will be the end of them. If you are going to squirm and twist because of a word invented by a jew in the 1920s and popularized by no less than Leon Trotsky, you are cooked before you start. I doubt that the hard men who will carve out the new country (if it happens) will abide by such nonsense. Take a good look at the way your British cousins are literally giving away their (our) ancestral homelands because they are squishy and forbearing.

  5. How can Dixians run a country with such a large Black population?

    Just turn the question around on them.

    How can South African Blacks run a country with such a large White population?

  6. Blacks are NOT known for management skills of any kind or of being connoisseurs of anything. They’re the lowest in the hierarchy of human species. They are the MOST different species than whites and CANNOT intermingle with white Christian society.
    To have a successful southern nation it would have to be lily white. To even maybe have a realm of possibility of achieving this … we would have to push “restructuring” aka Balkanization, of America and give the blacks their own Republic ( Southern California ), and the libtards, woketards and uninformed ( brainwashed ), white sheeple their own Republics as well. It would HAVE TO BE BY VOTE to avoid bloodshed.
    Don’t have much time though …
    https://www.hagmannpi.com/ep-4470-the-usual-suspects-should-be-afraid-as-we-awaken-organize-the-resistance-doug-hagmann-randy-taylor-continued-the-hagmann-report-june-23-2023/

    1. Interesting that this was also the view of none other than Abraham Lincoln! We’re too different to live together in the same polity. Jan Smuts also made some good observations on this failed Babel-like experiment:

      “Already the African system is disintegrating everywhere over the whole African continent. Missionaries share the blame with governments; the fight against the native social ideas has been no less destructive than the deposition of native chiefs and the institution of European organs of government. Unfortunately, the earlier efforts of missionary enterprise were made without reference to, or knowledge of, the peculiar native psychology, or the light which anthropology has thrown on the past of human cultures. For the natives, religion, law, natural science, social customs and institutions all form one blended whole, which enshrines their view of the world and of the forces governing it.

      The principle of equal rights [has been] applied in its crudest form, and while it gave the native a semblance of equality with whites, which was little good for him, it destroyed the basis of his African system which was his highest good. … [T]he British Empire does not stand for assimilation of its peoples into a common type; it does not stand for standardization, but for the fullest, freest development of its peoples along their own specific lines.

      [For the African] there is no inward incentive to improvement, there is no persistent effort in construction, and there is complete absorption in the present, its joys and sorrows. Wine, women, and song in their African forms remain the great consolations of life. These children of nature have not the inner toughness of the European, nor those social and moral incentives to progress which have built up European civilization in a comparatively short period. But they have a temperament which suits mother Africa, and which brings out the simple joys of life and deadens its pain, such as no other race possesses.”

      Jan Smuts, ‘Rhodes Memorial Lectures’, 1929

  7. I do not think that people whose only knowledge of Arabs and Iraq comes from watching Jeremy Renner pretend to de fuse fake bombs 💣 should be squawking nonsense in a public forum.
    Semper Fi and Good Night Chesty Puller Where Ever You Are

Comments are closed.