Like all real Southerners, I am sick and tired of hearing about diversity. That is not to say that I am against diversity; on the contrary, I am all for it in its truest form—that is, the state of affairs that results from the existence of variety—of things being different. Greater differentness equals greater diversity. Without differentness there cannot be diversity. Amalgamation destroys differentness. Cultural and racial amalgamation destroys diversity by producing a confused, hodgepodge mess whose character is considerably less than that of any of the original ingredients. Amalgamation is the very opposite of synergy, for it destroys the respective qualities and merits of separate, distinct entities. In other words, amalgamation creates something that is less than the sum of its parts.
The only way to protect diversity is to keep things separate, distinct, and unique. Doing so prevents cross contamination, thus preserving the respective integrities of the things concerned. Keeping things separate also ensures choice. That was what the War for Southern Independence was all about. If one wanted to live the Southern way, he could live in the South. If one wanted to live the Yankee way, he could live up North. That is real diversity on a grand scale. That is freedom of choice. Liberals conveniently ignore such logic. They also ignore the true meaning of “diversity” when they use that word to justify and champion a myriad of unsavory activities that include asinine hiring practices, negative depictions of Southerners, and the revision of history. However, one of the most harmful symptoms of the “liberal disease” is the promotion of miscegenation in movies and practically all advertisements. Liberals seem to have no regard whatsoever for the future generations that they are harming and endangering. The sad truth is that, due to poor parenting, or just being weak minded, some young people actually believe liberal propaganda that we are all actually the same—indeed as generic biological entities—which is completely false. Southerners instinctively know the dangers of amalgamation.
The chief danger of amalgamation is that it destroys bio diversity. Racial bio diversity affords the best possible chance that human beings will continue to inhabit this planet. As for susceptibility to disease or genetic disorders, not all races are equal. For instance, only blacks get sickle-cell anemia. Another example is lupus, which is more common in those of non-European descent. And finally, hemophilia C is more prevalent in Jews of Ashkenazi (east European) descent, while being rare in other population groups. (If you consider the above statements as “pure bigotry,” I recommend clicking on the links.) Therefore, if some disease, genetic disorder, or environmentally-related catastrophe were to befall the earth, not all races, potentially, would have the same susceptibility. Some race(s) might be able to survive, while others may go extinct. This is due to each race having different strengths and weaknesses.
If we’re all the same, we all have the same weaknesses and are therefore vulnerable to the same threat(s). By creating one homogenized race through amalgamation, we guarantee the possibility of our eventual extinction. Thus, for the collective welfare of mankind in general, we must think and act “genetically correct,” not “politically correct.” We must value actual diversity, not amalgamation.
An alarming 2002 study found that the prevalence of blue eye color among Caucasians in the United States has significantly dropped from 57.4% for those born from 1899 through 1905, to 33.8% for those born from 1936 through 1951. Blue eyes have become increasingly rare among American children, with only one out of every six, or 49.8 million out of 300 million of the total United States population, having blue eyes. The reason for this tragic plunge is obvious. Unchecked immigration, integration, and the decline of societal pressure have led to a dramatic increase in mixed marriages and mixed children. Blue eyes are disappearing within the United States, and pointing out this obvious fact will mark you as something outrageously disingenuous as an “extremist.”
A century ago, 80% of people married within their ethnic group. Thus, blue eyes were routinely passed down, especially among people of Western and Northern European ancestry. Clearly, for self preservation, we must return to the wise ways of our ancestors. Proper mate selection and child rearing is the answer. If we act now, we can stem, and reverse, the tide. If we do not, our people will eventually be bred out of existence, or overwhelmed through mass migration. That cannot be allowed to happen.
Whether you believe in creationism or evolution, you cannot escape the fact that it is by design that the many different races exist. To destroy that design is to seal our collective fate, in addition it’s clearly genocidal. After all, environmental forces had a significant hand in creating the different races. There are good reasons that Eskimos are short, stocky, fair-skinned people, while Africans are tall, thin people with dark skin. Until this planet develops a uniform global environment (which it never will), we must maintain and protect the respective distinctness of the various races. More to the point, we must protect our people. Our survival depends on it.
As for adoption, white people should adopt white children, blacks should adopt blacks, Asians should adopt Asians, Jews should adopt Jews, and so forth. That way, a child can grow up with a racial and cultural identity. Like most people, I am extremely suspicious of the motives of white people, typically white liberals, who adopt black children. What were Sandra Bullock, Madonna, Angelina Jolie, and Charlize Theron thinking and what were they trying to prove? Were there no white children that needed adopting? The whole thing reeks of some publicity stunt or perverse “Project Nim” experiment calculated to appeal to some demographic. Whatever their reasoning, what those celebrities did was wrong. Talk about growing up confused! Those black children won’t ever escape the label of “white-liberal fashion accessory.” That is just plain sad.
Liberals masquerade as enlightened, open-minded, and civilized, when in fact they are ignorant, misguided, and self-righteous. Liberals are nothing more than cancerous agitators. If Yankees and/or liberals don’t like how we do things down here, then they should either keep their mouths shut or leave. We will not be influenced or inconvenienced by their candy-ass, liberal rhetoric. We do not sway with the transient winds of fashion, be it social, political, or otherwise. Real Southerners think for themselves and use their common sense. We are proud, conservative, God-fearing folk who will fight to protect our race, culture, and heritage. We revere the ideals, beliefs, and values of our parents, grandparents, and great grandparents. To be a white, Christian, gentile Southerner is a birthright. To partake of Southern culture is a privilege. To maintain our differentness is a solemn duty that we dare not shirk. Otherwise, one day we will be extinct. Dixie lives in us and we live in Dixie. As long as we have the will to fight for her, she will endure.
-By Luther
O I’m a good old rebel, now that’s just what I am. For this “fair land of freedom” I do not care at all. I’m glad I fit against it, I only wish we’d won, And I don’t want no pardon for anything I done.
I’ve never bought into the idea that “the whole is greater than the sum of its parts” thing. This might be true in some other-worldly formulation, but I ain’t seeing it in the world we all inhabit. And for our purposes here, the world we all inhabit is all that matters to me.
I’ve always been more inclined to believe, with Jefferson et al, that, “the whole is exactly equal to the sum of its parts.” To be perfectly honest with you, I don’t even know what the slogan “the whole is greater (or lesser, for that matter) than the sum of its parts” even means. I mean, how can anyone prove or quantify that? They can’t, and that’s the point.
Personally, I live my life, or strive to live my life, by three fundamentally immutable (at least to me) rules or principles.:
Rule no. 1: Anything (any thing) taken to the extreme is bad. E.g., “workaholism” is bad; so is serial idleness/laziness. I could of course go on and on adding examples more or less equivalent.
Rule no. 2: Whenever mere human beings begin trying to improve on God’s perfect design (as we have from the gitgo), they’re screwing up. Bigtime! E.g., “family planning,” so called. Nature has a way of correcting these (in)human screw ups, not necessarily during your or my (drop in the bucket) lifespans, but nevertheless.
Rule no. 3: The wages of sin is death. Disregarding the above two rules is in fact sin, and therefore suicide (on a lesser or greater scale).
You rightly mention “poor parenting” in the article. I tend to think this will correct itself over time. Poor parenting within the black community is just the way it is and always has been (and perhaps ever shall be); poor parenting within white, western European confines is a different matter altogether. It’s sort of a new thing, and mainly consists in “family planning” best I can tell. But that is a big subject I ain’t real sure I could even halfway get into at this point.
Good article, btw. I’m impressed!