Let’s run through a list of key government policies. Does a majority of the population approve of any of them? No. Why were they implemented in every Western country by elected officials? Election after election, despite the shifting fortunes of various parties, why do they never change? Everything is getting worse. So, surely if this is about what the people want, something would be done about the following:
– Unending mass immigration to fundamentally transform demographics, turning all original populations into minorities in nations devoid of any racial, religious, and cultural coherence. (see tweet below)
– An economic and financial system rooted in chicanery and unsustainable parasitism which is progressively stripping the middle-class of its wealth and teeters on the edge of collapse.
– A series of escalating wars that serve no discernible national interest while ending consistently in disaster.
– Rampant crime while “White extremism” is declared the premier national threat.
– A constriction of energy supplies in the name of an absurd hoax about climate change.
– Pervasive, relentless LGBTQIA+ agenda.
– Comprehensive public and private discrimination against White people.
This is the grim beauty of democracy. The people get to vote for who they want to do what they need, and in return, none of this happens. To the extent they can afford to invest themselves in something so psychologically draining, most of the population contents itself with the naive view of politics that resembles an affinity with a sports team.
Blame can be bestowed upon office holders who can’t and wouldn’t change anything important to the primary agenda of the plutocracy. If things get bad, the public can put their hopes in the next election. There’s always another stooge with zero loyalty to his own they can invest some hope in. With each cycle, nobody knows who’s actually in charge and thus how to demand regime change. That’s why it all keeps getting worse when obvious steps could be taken to make things better.
If anyone points this out, his peers will denounce him for being anti-democratic. Pointing out that common people have no say in their government is equated with saying that they shouldn’t. This offends the average person. The whole endeavor is shut down before it ever gets underway. Everyone knows what this country does to people who oppose democracy. Whether it’s Saddam Hussein or your grandpa who walked into the Capitol on January 6th, it won’t be pretty, but they deserve what happens to them. Democracy is truly the best system for those it actually serves.
Monarchy was highly problematic since kings held their station by virtue of birth, and their mothers had to be of high Christian birth as well. A king could be bribed, but not screened and picked or replaced at will. The men who led his army held their positions by virtue of the same criteria. The clergy were an integral part of this system and exercised a great deal of influence over society. This meant it was time to hit the road if he didn’t want to pay you back for a loan or public discontent at your behavior forced him to take action. Sometimes, it meant simply tolerating the outrage of the mob. The transparent legitimacy of one’s authority confers accountability. Hundreds of expulsions happened as a result.
After the Tzar and his entire family, along with most of the clergy and upper classes of Russia, were slaughtered, it seemed like communism was going to be the perfect system to scale up globally. The problem was that they were able to convulse Russia with evil and insanity on such a scale it was on the verge of collapse. Communism as carried out by Trotsky and his ilk couldn’t work, except as a nightmare of rape, murder, and plunder.
This led to Joseph Stalin and his successors who weren’t up for election or part of the milieu that produces Western politicians. Communism created the same problem it was meant to solve by replacing monarchy. By the 1980s, the Tzar was on his way to being declared a saint. Despite millions of excess deaths, society was stable enough that it survived their looting operation in the 1990s. Rather than being broken up, Russia maintained a leadership class that now openly declares it’s at war with a Satanic global order that actually controls the West. Things didn’t go so well in China, either.
That’s why democracy is the “end of history” system. Nobody has a say, while we repeat the mantra that every vote counts. The West will be ruled with complete impunity save the consequences the rulers bring down on their own heads (not that we’ll be spared). We can probably expect more layers of dystopia to get added on, such as Central Bank Digital Currencies. What I’m sure of is that we can’t vote our way out of this nightmare. If we could, they wouldn’t extol democracy all the time.
The euphoria of this week six years ago seems like a distant memory. Back then, you could spout this sort of rhetoric but then look at what actually happened. It was amazing and everything the hysterical fools assured us on television was dead wrong. What’s more, the alternative media played a huge role in it. It was incredible to experience up close. It felt like concessions would have to be made in order to keep the system going, as if perhaps they weren’t going to ram it all into the ground after all.
We soon received a very unpleasant lesson about how they were going to fix the failings of democracy. Some of us are still dealing with the fallout in our lives to this day. Meanwhile, Trump never did anything of substance. I’m never going to get caught up in that nonsense again because I’m too well acquainted with the big picture. Hope isn’t lost, just don’t waste your optimism on the outcome of a vote.
If you can get something like not being fired in Florida for refusing injections, that’s great. However, the larger issues of why the COVID insanity happened in the first place or the purposes that it’s been serving were never parsed in an election. Things are what they are, and not what we want them to be, which is a tough reality to accept on an emotional level. That’s probably why most people would rather invest themselves in the democracy sham.
I’m proud to officially announce my candidacy for the office of Dogcatcher.
“a tough reality to accept on an emotional level. That’s probably why most people would rather invest themselves in the democracy sham.”
It’s what most of the real globalist power brokers count on: the unshakeable belief of the masses in American exceptionalism.
For myself, I’ve always been more in line with John Randolph of Roanoke who said:
“It is an infirmity of my nature — it is constitutional — it was born with me — it has caused the misery (if you will) of my life. It is an infirmity of my nature to have an obstinate constitutional preference of the true over the agreeable.”
John Randolph of Roanoke, ‘Speech on Executive Powers’, March 1, 1826.
(You’ve been pouring out a prolific number of excellent articles of late. Well done!)
You forgot chem trailing, GMO, fluoride, 5 G and asset forfeiture. The solution is to educate the normies with both truth and a goal to work towards : The restructuring of America into 4 or 5 new republics … ours being a very enlarged all white CSA II.
The solution is very very simple obvious common sense.
Achieving it will take a few smart white Christian southern think tanks vigorously moving forward …
Democracy is a totalitarian form of mob rule which cynically exploits the greed of individuals to always vote in favor of their own short term best interests without any regard for moral principles or the inalienable rights of others. Skilled politicians can gain power and riches by peddling influence to the globalist elites and by instigating conflicts between the masses. The welfare class will always vote for whichever party promises to give them the most free goods and services paid for by robbing the working class through inflation. Therefore, government should only be empowered to protect and not to provide anything to anyone.
I dunno, man, people are pretty stupid on average. I’ll grant that the majority of the population doesn’t necessarily “approve” of your list, in the sense that they don’t conduct their lives in that way. But that’s about as far as I’m willing to take it. That isn’t the same thing as their approving (or disapproving) of certain of those things to the extent that they’re willing to “make a federal case of it.” Besides, whether they “approve” of LGBTQIA+ et al lunacy or not, most “Americans” agree that those people ought to “have an equal voice” with the rest of us. And that’s the “fatal flaw,” as Dr. Dabney put it, “in our theories of popular government.”
One reason I generally do not bother participating in our vaunted elections is because I am given too few choices on a given ballot. I mean, I didn’t nominate Senator McCain or Hussein Obama, nor did I vote in the primaries that put either of them on the ballot under the two tickets. If I had, my vaunted “vote” wouldn’t have changed anything in any case. So I abstained in both the primaries and the general election under silent protest. I can’t tell you how many times I’ve been told over the years that my choice of abstention (in that election and others) means nothing less than, (1) that I have “no right to complain,” therefore, and (2), that a non-vote is the same thing as a vote for the other party candidate.
This is what I’m referring to when I talk about how stupid the average American voter is, or, how unacquainted (s)he is with his own “mode of electing President,” etc. I live in a state that consistently votes Republican (regardless of how bad the Republican candidate is) by at least a 65/35 margin. It’s not a “swing state” by any stretch of the imagination. But that I didn’t vote (because the “better” candidate was so bad) means to a large number of my fellow citizens that I effectively voted for the “greater of two evils.” This is “Human Stupidity” at another level! Carlos Cipolla’s essay on the subject is a pretty good source to reflect back upon from time to time, just to stay well-grounded.
Good article, though.
Its funny the weird double-think we have in the West. Feminism and Stronk Empowered Womyn are the key tenants of the Western globalist system.
How does one then, logically, not consider Burma’s former female president, Aung San Suu Kyi, who carried out acts of ethnic cleansing against the country’s Muslim minority to be a pinnacle of a Stronk Empowered Womyn?
Its certainly democratic as well, where 51% of the population gets to oppress the other 49%. The vast majority of the population is Buddhist and supports the eradication of Islamic troublemakers from their borders.