Esse Quam Videri (i.e. to be, rather than to seem) is the motto of North Carolina and, ironically, a number of institutions of higher learning.
This is a new Latin phrase for me, but it has given me much food for thought. I remember an executive vice president of a company for which I used to work saying: “It’s not what is. It’s what it appears to be” and thinking even then (some thirty-odd years ago) how at odds such a credo was with everything I’d been taught by my father. It was Alfred von Schlieffen who coined the apothegm, “Great achievements, small display: more reality than appearance” and Moltke who had said that “Only the capable succeed.” These were at the core of the German and Christian work ethic in the roots of my upbringing.
In 180-degree opposition, the anti-philosophy of “seeming” is evidenced in the Yankee Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr.’s theory that law is experience, not logic. Inauthentic existence is at the end of this fuse, where, as Dostoyevsky rightly observed, “everything’s permissible” and every anti-Christian assertion has equal validity.
It should be self-evident that society can’t function in the absence of an absolute standard to which all are at least tacitly consenting. Patrick Henry had observed that “Good faith is essential to the happiness of mankind” and “That its want stops all human intercourse.” When the entails of a moral relativism in which each individual is only doing what’s right in his own eyes reaches its terminus, the hitherto behind-the-scenes chosen tribe and their father, along with their traitorous allies, can then come forward to assume the mantle over a mankind that has become cultureless, and openly reveal themselves and their mission:
“Our mission consists in promulgating the new law and in creating a God; that is to say in purifying the idea of God and realizing it when the time shall come. We shall purify that idea by identifying it with the nation of Israel, which has become its own Messiah. In these ideas we find our New Testament in which we reconcile kings and prophets.”
Otto Kahn, quotation from the Comte de Saint-Aulaire in Geneve contre la Paix Libraire Plan, Paris, 1936
For any who may be crying foul at the Otto Kahn quote, consider what one of their own lackeys wrote in 1920 before he later went on their payroll:
“It may well be that this same astounding race may at the present time be in the actual process of producing another system of morals and philosophy, as malevolent as Christianity was benevolent, which, if not arrested, would shatter irretrievably all that Christianity has rendered possible. It would almost seem as if the gospel of Christ and the gospel of Antichrist were destined to originate among the same people; and that this mystic and mysterious race had been chosen for the supreme manifestations, both of the divine and the diabolical.”
Winston Churchill, Zionism vs. Bolshevism, 1920
Is there really a conspiracy? Does any of this sound familiar? It should. Consider Genesis 3:5 and its origin: “For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.” In other words, forget about God’s Law. You can, out of your own experience, decide what’s right and wrong. Or, as Aleister Crowley and his followers would put it more succinctly: “Do as thou wilt.”
Richard Weaver, author of Ideas Have Consequences, with which all our readers should become familiar, describes so well the moral vacuum created when there’s a denial of anything transcending human experience:
“If physical nature is the totality and if man is of nature, it is impossible to think of him as suffering from constitutional evil; his defections must now be attributed to his simple ignorance or to some kind of social deprivation. … There is no term proper to describe the condition in which he is now left unless it be “abysmality.” He is in the deep and dark abysm, and he has nothing with which to raise himself. His life is practice without theory. As problems crowd upon him, he deepens confusion by meeting them with ad hoc policies. He struggles with the paradox that total immersion in matter unfits him to deal with the problems of matter. … Here [also follows] the assault upon definition: if words no longer correspond to objective realities, it seems no great wrong to take liberties with words.”
It’s small wonder that our society has become rife with posturing “seemers” who can be held to no accountability for their words or actions. The two qualities that now seem most to be valued for promotion and preferment are a feigned courage and audacity in pandering to the vagaries of the masses, while maintaining an obsequious conformity to the politically correct will of the elite who are answering to the money power.
Christians, it’s time for all of us who “name the name” of Christ to repent and return to the Word who is Christ — the TRUE vine. Read John Chapter 15 again with the agency of the Holy Spirit revealing how God the Father is the husbandman who will prune, (for increased fruit-bearing), those who are truly in that vine, but will cut off any dead branches who prove to be only “seemers.” We should pray that God will make all of us to be, in truth, what we seem and profess to be. If our enemies hate us for it, we’ll know by their hatred and show ourselves to be His true disciples, while it will be to them a token of their perdition – Phil. 1:28.
Esse Quam Videri
-By German Confederate
O I’m a good old rebel, now that’s just what I am. For this “fair land of freedom” I do not care at all. I’m glad I fit against it, I only wish we’d won, And I don’t want no pardon for anything I done.
Excellent piece of writing, sir. I was delighted to see your nom de plume in the by-line. Well done and press on!
Thanks for your encouragement, sir. The concluding paragraph was a self-exhortation not to remain in the place of the breaking forth of children per Hos. 13:12. (I told my sister that writing was like childbirth for me!). If others similarly benefit from it, then Soli Deo Gloria.
Very inspiring piece. Can a man be a Christian without a Church? Our churches, like most of our institutions, have been weaponized against us. Christian Zionism is the norm. It is what I was taught and believed for many years. If it is frowned upon to post links to other sites, then I apologize in advance. I’m not Orthodox, but I found this article also inspiring.
https://southernorthodox.org/the-kinsman-redeemer-of-the-south/
Thanks for the comment fire-eater. You’re right that it’s tough to find a good church. I have to drive almost 20 miles to my church (which is very small), but has like-minded believers. If you can’t find one, you may want to turn to Sermonaudio online. Chuck Baldwin is a real fire-eater!
Thanks, I greatly appreciate the info!
Great to see you writing articles on ID. It’s where you belong as far as I’m concerned.
Looking forward to more of them.
God Bless you Sir.
Thank you Outside looking in. I’ve always appreciated reading your comments and your book recommendations, and look forward to a continuing exchange – God willing.
I’d have to deflect most of the credit towards those I quoted (particularly Richard Weaver) in the body of the piece, but thanks for reading it.
All good books are usually referenced to exceptional authors, your heart shows through your work, take some credit.
I’ve always wanted to share this quote that really rung a bell for me in the beginning of my personal social studies inquiry.
From “who killed society” emery. 1960 p.252
This is a quote from an ethnic Germans observations of America.
Mr. Grund had a few kind words for the South. “I prefer” he said, “the white gloved democrat from the South, with his Aristocratic bearing, to the ungloved Aristocrat from the North…….
Mr. Grund had the harshest of words-and prophecies:
The movable, moneyed Aristocracy of our times I consider as the greatest enemy to mankind, in comparison to which all the terrors of the feudal system are as nothing. The nobility of the Middle Ages offered to the people protection for Vassalage, and set them the example of chivalry and valour. A mere moneyed aristocracy, on the contrary, enslaves the people without giving them an equivalent, introducing everywhere the most sordid principals of selfishness, to the exclusion of every noble and disinterested sentiment. A mere moneyed preponderance of one class of citizens over the other, does not form as historical a link between the present and the past; neither does it, like the masses, represent the interests of mankind in general. All it’s tendencies are downward, reducing a people gradually to a degree of moral degradation, from which perhaps they might have been saved by the presence of a powerful nobility of family.
Spoken a few years before the war of Northern aggression.
God Bless the Southland
Thanks, as always, for your comments and quotes. However well-read by modern standards any of us may think we are, yours is a reminder that all of us have read different things. The ideas expressed in your quote from Mr. Grund also find expression in Richard Walther Darre’s ‘A New Nobility of Blood and Soil’ and in the South’s own John Taylor of Caroline’s ‘Tyranny Unmasked’. God bless you for enriching this website with your exchange of ideas. I’ve certainly profited from it.