2020 – Year of the Rat

As of Sunday, April 19th, a Chinese wet-market virus has a confirmed case total of 2,359,389 and 161,968 deaths. How believable are these numbers though; are the news purveyors as well as governments and their nationally sponsored public health departments giving a truthful picture to the general public? In America, and as of April 19th, there were 740,151 “confirmed” cases and 39,068 deaths. But how are these numbers derived – did the China virus truly kill every single one of these people; did they test positive for the China virus, but died from something else? As an individual that seeks the truth of all things, you will often find that the truth is politically incorrect in America today. Covid-19’s death rate statistics have been deliberately skewed by health agencies through misreporting and the diagnostic testing procedures are inaccurate, thus creating a false pandemic. In a real pandemic, the internet isn’t inundated with hospital staff gyrating in TikTok videos.

The death rate statistics have been deliberately skewed not only in America, but also in all nations that report Covid-19 cases. Individuals with serious underlying health conditions are the only ones truly being affected. The majority of people who die have known health conditions as follows: cardiovascular disease, diabetes, chronic respiratory disease, hypertension, and cancer. Any single one of these diseases can kill you by itself. If an individual has one of these health conditions and they contract the Chinese virus, does the virus really kill you or is it the health condition? The reporting health agencies, who tally up the totals, lump all deaths with a “positive Covid-19 result” together, no matter what. Currently, if you have cancer, but you contracted the virus before you die, it gets chalked up to the Chinese virus. After learning this, an individual might ask, “Well, what are the true statistics of Covid-19?” According to John’s Hopkins, 86% of those who experience a critical illness due to Covid-19 have comorbidities, but the fatality rates for all cases are as follows:

The above chart is from worldometers, which is an entity that has been compiling Covid-19 statistics since it first broke out in Wuhan. As the chart depicts, only 0.9% of those who die with Covid-19 have no pre-existing health conditions. So, how does that translate to the overall statistics?  As of April 19th, there were 161,968 deaths, which would mean that only 1,458 known people, without pre-existing health conditions, have died from Covid-19 throughout the entire planet.

The illusion of a pandemic has been created through diagnostic tests. Official makers of the diagnostic tests have denoted major flaws in their own tests. Because the case numbers are based on these flawed tests, a movie-like pandemic has been created and is constantly paraded about by the media. The commonly used test for Covid-19 is called the PCR. The following examples come directly from the CDC, WHO, and PCR test makers.

1. From an FDA/CDC document, “CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCov) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel”:

“Detection of viral RNA may not indicate the presence of infectious virus or that 2019-nCoV is the causative agent for clinical symptoms.”

Interpretation: A positive result does not mean the Covid-19 virus is the agent of infection or even exists in the patient’s body.


2. From a WHO document, “Coronavirus disease (Covid-19) technical guidance: Laboratory testing for 2019-nCoV in humans”:

Immunodiagnostic Tests

“At present, based on current evidence, WHO recommends the use of these new point-of-care immunodiagnostic tests only in research settings. They should not be used in any other setting, including for clinical decision-making, until evidence supporting use for specific indications is available.”

Rapid diagnostic tests based on antigen detection

“WHO does not currently recommend the use of antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic tests for patient care, although research into their performance and potential diagnostic utility is highly encouraged.”

Rapid diagnostic tests based on host antibody detection

“WHO does not recommend the use of antibody-detecting rapid diagnostic tests for patient care but encourages the continuation of work to establish their usefulness in disease surveillance and epidemiologic research.”

Interpretation: The PCR testing procedures in place for Covid-19 are not accurate for acceptable critical decision making. These tests are registering positive for every single type of coronavirus, including the strains that only cause a common cold; therefore, more research into these testing procedures is necessary to establish an acceptable result.


3. From an FDA document, “Labcorp COVID-19RT-PCR test EUA Summary, Accelerated Emergency use authorization summary Covid-19 RT-PCR Test”:

“…The SARS-CoV-2 RNA is generally detectable in respiratory specimens during the acute phase of infection. Positive results are indicative of the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA; clinical correlation with patient history and other diagnostic information is necessary to determine patient infection status. Positive results do not rule out bacterial infection or co-infection with other viruses. The agent detected may not be the definite cause of disease. Laboratories within the United States and its territories are required to report all positive results to the appropriate public health authorities.”

Interpretation: While the test can “generally” detect the presence of Covid-19 in a patient, results do not rule out “the agent detected” is the cause of disease. In other words, unless the patient has an acute infection, Covid-19 cannot be ruled as the definitive infection agent. This is why the term, “Asymptomatic patients” was introduced, to describe individuals who cannot be conclusively determined to have Covid-19. Under this logic used by governments and public health departments, everyone in the world with a common cold is asymptomatic unless proven infected exclusively with Covid-19, which is absolutely crazy to be making governing decisions upon. Also, lest we not forget, every single positive result, regardless of its accuracy, must be reported and these results are regarded as Covid-19 case numbers.


4. From a manufacturer of PCR test kit components, Creative Diagnostics, “SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus Multiplex RT-qPCR Kit”:

Regulatory Status

“For research use only, not for use in diagnostic procedures.”

Intended Use

“This product is intended for the detection of 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV). The detection result of this product is only for clinical reference, and it should not be used as the only evidence for clinical diagnosis and treatment.”

Disclaimer

“For research and laboratory use only. Not for diagnostic, therapeutic, drug, household or other uses.”

Interpretation: The test kit results garnered through use of these components are not for diagnostic tests and are exclusively for research. On the test kit makers website, it mentions that these test kit components will produce a positive result if the components detect a variety of other viruses and pneumoniae such as Influenza, adeno, mycoplasma, etc; therefore, if a positive test result occurs, it is not necessarily Covid-19.


5. From Abbott diagnostics who is rolling out ID Now Covid-19 tests, which spit out results quickly:

“The ID NOW COVID-19 EUA has not been FDA cleared or approved. It has been authorized by the FDA under an emergency use authorization for use by authorized laboratories and patient care settings. The test has been authorized only for the detection of nucleic acid from SARS-CoV-2, not for any other viruses or pathogens, and is only authorized for the duration of the declaration that circumstances exist justifying the authorization of emergency use of in vitro diagnostic tests for detection and/or diagnosis of COVID-19 under Section 564(b)(1) of the Act, 21 U.S.C. § 360bbb-3(b)(1), unless the authorization is terminated or revoked sooner.”

Interpretation: Abbott stands to make a solid profit on inaccurate tests. Since March 23rd, around the time the announcement was made to enter the coronavirus economy by producing rapid-result coronavirus tests, their stock alone is up ~35%.  Abbott’s tests are beholden to the FDA emergency authorization, and, as we learned earlier, the FDA knows these tests don’t verify anything past an individual possessing a common cold unless there is an acute infection.


These tests are not intended for the exclusive basis of Covid-19 diagnosis within an individual, yet this is exactly what health authorities are using them for throughout the world; furthermore, the PCR test has never been validated as an instrument to detect Covid-19. None of these tests show how much of the virus exists in an individual, which is the direct correlation needed to talk about an actual illness. All vaccines contain pieces, antigens, of a pathogen to train the immune system to recognize and fight against said pathogen. If one were to project Covid-19 test effectiveness to other diseases, then every individual who has had a polio vaccination has polio and etc. Vetting of the tests has never been performed; studies have not been conducted to verify the test results in the patients where a positive test occurred.  Therefore, the Covid-19 pandemic is fake and is being used to manipulate the general masses.

The death rate statistics are being skewed through underlying health conditions such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes, chronic respiratory disease, hypertension, and cancer. Those with no pre-existing health conditions who die only represent 0.000019% of the total human population. Through the use of the Covid-19 tests, the illusion of a pandemic has been created. These tests return a positive result even if Covid-19 does not exist in the body. Do you know anyone personally who has died yet from this disease, or, if not, are you aware of any friends of friends who have passed away?  If this pandemic is fake, then what is really occurring behind the scenes that warrants such misdirection by our government? Surely, this is the real question to which we will likely have an answer to in the near future, whether we like it or not…

-By Gaius

Sources:

Death Rate Statistics being Skewed:

  1. https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/coronavirus-age-sex-demographics/

Diagnostic Testing Sources:

  1. https://www.fda.gov/media/136151/download
  2. https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download
  3. https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/technical-guidance/laboratory-guidance
  4. https://www.creative-diagnostics.com/sars-cov-2-coronavirus-multiplex-rt-qpcr-kit-277854-457.htm
  5. https://www.abbott.com/corpnewsroom/product-and-innovation/detect-covid-19-in-as-little-as-5-minutes.html

2 comments

  1. Apparently you didn’t get the memo. The sorts of thoughts you allow your mind to entertain are dangerous to the health of mindless drones and simpering little school girls. It’s back to the gulags for you, mister!

  2. First world health services keep so many seriously ill people alive now you could essentially classify a flu as a pandemic (I understand it’s not just the flu ok, bro). I’ve seen quite a few outlets taking the narrative route that COVID-19 not being that dangerous is a ‘boomer take’ just because a few MAGA boomer types had a pretty lousy protest in Virginia, Detroit and so on… This is just a strawman to avoid talking the actual numbers, Just because neo-conservatives don’t defend peoples rights unless it’s situations where the false economy is at stake doesn’t mean that rights are something which shouldn’t preserved. Anyone who thinks that laws passed now won’t be used against them in the future is naive.

    An additional point is that if individual states in America had more power to govern their own people they would probably be more effective at combating the virus anyway, large centralized government is why people are so distrustful and don’t listen to begin with, they have no real relation to it.

Comments are closed.