Many of us despise what has become of our world, our society, our communities, and our cities. We look back to the past with a sense of longing; it was a time when people were more decent, things more sane, and more logical. It was a time when we didn’t question our place in the world or ourselves. Life was undeniable at the time; it was woven into the very fabric of who we are. Life wasn’t deconstructed and managed by “woke” philosophy.
But today, as things slide further past the precipice, we claw at answers as to how we got here. Suicide rates are up, drug overdoses are at an all-time high, our borders are invaded by people who not only truly hate us, but want to destroy us and work actively to do so with each passing day. We watch as institutions and individuals, we once revered and even strived to emulate, get torn down and destroyed before our very eyes.
We ask in despair, “How? Why?“
To answer this, we must explore the root of the problem.
Once we had a society, one where you could leave your doors unlocked and where you didn’t have to worry about who watched your kids. One where our schools built citizens into purveyors of thought, innovation, intelligence, and free spirit. It was a society without female pastors in rainbow vestments preaching tolerance for sin. It was a society that didn’t resemble an Arab bazaar. It was a place where our people weren’t demonized constantly. These thoughts never so much entered our heads because we never imagined our horrifying future.
So, we must ask how this all came to be. And to answer that, we must understand an old tale – the tale of the Greeks.
The Trojan Horse is a story from the Trojan War, about the subterfuge that the Greeks deployed to enter the city of Troy and, eventually, win the war. In the canonical version, after a futile decade-long siege, the Greeks constructed a huge wooden horse and hid a select force of men inside, including the famed hero Odysseus. The Greeks pretended to sail away, and the Trojans foolishly pulled the horse into their city as a victory trophy. That night, the Greek force crept out of the horse and opened the gates for the rest of the Greek army, which had sailed back to Troy under the cover of night. The Greeks entered and destroyed the city of Troy, ending the costly war.
The Trojan Horses, for there are many, of the American Empire can be found in multiple places: the destruction of the Republic in the 1860s, feminism in the 1910s and 1920s, communist infiltrators from the 1930s and into the 1960s, the so-called “civil rights” movement of the 1960s, the introduction of narcotics on a massive scale in the 1970s and 1980s, no-fault divorce in the 1970s, and acceptance of homosexuality in the last decade. Our Trojan Horses are many and we’ve only scratched the surface. But, suffice it to say, the 20th century was anything but good for Western society.
Incrementalism is the method used to create long-term change slowly and over a vast period of time. Incrementalism always starts with the Trojan Horse.
Our enemies, be they armed or unarmed, have worked tirelessly and diligently to slowly chip away at the very fabric of our society. They eat, breath, and sleep for not only the destruction of the South, but all European societies. It is not just one group of people, as some may want to claim. It is a fundamental coagulation of all our anti-civilizational rivals into one massive, deformed monster. That is what we are truly fighting and must fight if we are to save the West, Christendom and Dixie.
To begin taking back everything, as we have so put it on this site, it starts with xenophobism. In the dictionary, xenophobism is defined as, “fear of strangers or foreigners,” but this is wrong and simply a useful smear label for the Left. Make no mistake, I am not fearful of foreigners. I know beyond a doubt my capabilities. War taught me that. Pulsing through my veins is the blood of innovators, explorers, and conquerers. No one did it better than us.
The reason the other cannot compare is because they are not us. They are not European, Heritage American or Dixian. They cannot be, nor will they ever be, us. It is often said imitation is the best form of flattery, but it also reveals hypocrisy and jealousy. See, the other cannot ever admit the painful truth – that they wish they could be us. So, they pretend and, ultimately, wish to destroy us. Their goal is simple – to assume the mantle of civilization. When the dust settles, they will claim it was always them. We will never have existed, or built great societies, or invented things that changed the world, or made living far better than it ever was. Our memory will be that of an evil scourge or nonexistent.
Overwhelmingly, Western society has been, and continues to be, the driving force behind the direction of the world. We shared our gifts with the other and brought civilization to savages. Now, we’re utterly hated by those we helped.
Be it so. This burning of widows is your custom; prepare the funeral pile. But my nation has also a custom. When men burn women alive we hang them, and confiscate all their property. My carpenters shall therefore erect gibbets on which to hang all concerned when the widow is consumed. Let us all act according to national customs.[To Hindu priests complaining to him about the prohibition of Sati religious funeral practice of burning widows alive on her husband’s funeral pyre.]
Charles James Napier
We must wake up. And for those of us already awake, our most holy mission is to wake up others as well. Our Trojan Horse is now diversity and immigration. The other will pretend and destroy. They make their intentions clear, there’s no need for subterfuge at this point.
God, family, country, in that order. Deo Vindice.
God bless you and God bless Dixie.
I have seen three emperors in their nakedness, and the sight was not inspiring.
Well, I don’t know what dictionary you got that definition from, but any “phobia” (the “phob” part of the compound word, xenophobia and xenophobism) so called is, by definition, an irrational fear of the thing in question. There is nothing irrational about the fear of an existential crisis (or impending existential crisis) for your people and way of life brought about by mass immigration and political empowerment of the other. That is what is wrong with the term, the fact that it names a thing a “phobia” or irrational fear, that is in fact perfectly rational and perfectly normal. The real phobia here is on the other side of the question and might be called “anti-xenophobophobia.” But I’m content to leave it to the wordsmiths among us to give it a proper term.
The scripture warns us not to cast our pearls before swine – which is essentially what we’ve done – as you know, and it also explains the probable results of doing so. Sometimes we just gotta learn the hard way, I guess.
This is a good article; one of your best. I commend you for the more prolific use of your pen (or keyboard) of late. Soldier on, Sir!
Oops! I meant to address this part of your paragraph that I quoted, but got ahead of myself:
I don’t think anyone who fly within our circles would ever be so bold to question the bravery, the physical prowess or capabilities, of a man he knows very little about. And this is not what the term “xenophobe” is designed to imply in any case, as I hope I successfully pointed out above. I grant you that many of the people who unthinkingly use the term probably do so under a misconception as to its actual meaning, but that’s just ignorance on their parts or stupidity. If the latter it can’t be cured; if the former one might be able to cure it with instruction/education. Might! Words mean something, though, and that is why I write these little screeds even when I agree wholeheartedly with the main gist of your points.
P.S. I got into a little email dispute with one of my state Congressmen some years back over his declaring those of us who were firmly against his support of relocating foreign nationals within the borders of my state. He made a big show of referring to us in general as “unAmerican” and “cowards,” so I called him out on it in an email. We argued back and forth for a while before he worked up the courage to say that I was in fact one of the cowards he had before alluded to. I simply replied that I would be very happy to meet him somewhere – just the two of us – where we would quickly determine whether he was brave enough to call me a coward to my face. I never heard anything out of him again, even though I renewed the invitation a couple of times afterward.
As I’m sure you well know, it is very easy for a coward to project his own cowardice onto another man via the internet, or in a phone or texting conversation or whatever; not s’much in a face-to-face, one-on-one encounter.
This teaching is the legs of the Trojan Horse of bringing in the worship of a man (Mystery Babylon) as creator of the universe (what balderdash) … I will not fight in our people’s continued grafting onto that vine/tree of Shiva-Moloch-Yahweh worship:
Luke 14:26
If any man come to me, and does not hate his father, and mother, and wife, and children, and brethren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he cannot be my disciple. TYhis is the epitome of nihilistic Shiva-Moloch-Yahweh worship
Alright, kid, move on. No one here is in the least persuaded by your proof-texting idiocy against the likes of our eminent forbears, Thomas Jackson, R.E. Lee, R.L. Dabney, et al. Enough of this stupidity already!
Amen!
Question, how much DMT did you take before you made this post?
so you prefer the noble virtues of Eostre? Gaia? Pan? Saturn? Priapus? Baccus?
whatever, just remember which Europeans kicked out the Pharisees (Ferdinand and Isabella), which ones accepted them (Nero, Eleagabalus, Julian the Apostate, all the Enlighteners and Revolutionaries), and learn who’s your enemy…
oh and don’t go crazy hexing about children on “samhain”…
Boy it sure didn’t take long to take down the truth ..
Lots of youngsters think they have a (gnostic) handle on “truth” their more experienced worldly-wise and better educated elders simply do not possess and cannot see. That’s nothing especially new or unique to the modern era; the novelty of it is, however, that these blathering nincompoops are generally given an “equal voice” with their moral and intellectual superiors, whereas in former times their opinions were looked upon (as they well should have been looked upon) and treated as youthful indiscretion borne of hyper-sensationalism untamed or improperly disciplined.
Writing is a form of communication unique to human beings. More specifically, it is a way (a means) by which a mind capable of transmitting intelligent thought communicates (in writing – the stringing together of written words to form intelligible thoughts by way of sentences, paragraphs and so forth) with another mind capable of receiving intelligent thought. There is a third element in these arrangements, and that is a common mode of communication between the two (a common language, for example).
Now, when one or the other of them begins to violate or stray away from the long-settled rules of these forms, communication obviously suffers and begins to break down.
Your friend might well possess “the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth,” but if he can’t effectively communicate it according to the simple rules of common discourse, then he’s wasting his time, and ours, and therefore should “move on” as I said, until he is better prepared to offer up an intelligible argument. None of us is going to pay any mind to his rambling, incoherent utterences, so there is no point to his posting them, and a big waste of time on his part.
I’ll give him credit where credit is due and acknowledge the fact that, in his later screed, he threw in a period and a couple of misplaced commas for good measure, but that is just being charitable on my part. His incoherent rambling screeds received the treatment they richly deserved.
Get your sh*t straight and act like you have some sense, or be prepared to receive the same treatment. And rightly so.
And that’s all I got to say about that.
take a look below… they are trying to tell y’all something…. like staying on a permanent ski trip 😉
They try, in vain, to impress us with their gnostic interpretations of scripture and history. If they could do so coherently, that would be one thing; that they invariably do it incoherently settles the fate of their ill-conceived ideological screeds from the gitgo.
Now, I might have a more precise manner of identifying and stating the problem than most, but that is beside the point. The issue, as I said above, is that they cannot possibly challenge us – their moral, intellectual, and ideological superiors – on moral or intellectual grounds which satisfy the three logical requirements of intelligent communication between minds.
This becomes blatantly obvious in their incoherent screeds.
Yahweh is the god of calamity …
3050. Yah + 1943. hovah
When dissected in the Hebrew, the true definition of Jehovah (Yah-Hovah) is revealed. “Yah” (#H3050) means “god”. “Hovah” (#H1943) translates to ” calamity”
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/564x/e8/59/c9/e859c94abbf43329ccbf4dcde2ec19a9.jpg
You know. I wonder if you are an agent of the SPLC looking to stir up something so as to get screen caps for your latest hit piece? It’s not far outside the realm of possibility.