I’ve written about this one before when I mused about starting a consequences consulting firm, but for the benefit of any new readers, here’s my advice on a certain race expressed in probability theory:
As the number of African Americans involved in your life increases, the probability of your murder approaches 1.
There’s a less polite phrase about the combustion of an ancient, compressed form of carbon as well. You might’ve heard of it, but I’m not the sort of gentleman who spouts crude aphorisms and racial slurs. What I’m trying to do today is note a series of things impacting our society and speculate about the implications.
First, I’d like to note that law enforcement and the public school system are in place to deal with blacks. Every miscreant this planet has to offer is flooding into America these days, but originally, blacks were why we have these systems. They’re actually nonessential for white people.
If left to ourselves, schools would be organized based on various secular and religious communities while some people would school their children at home. The education provided would actually be far superior to the current public schools, whose primary directives are not punishing blacks and not giving them worse grades than whites.
It’s the same thing with the police. White people have conducted most of their historical existence without modern police forces and done just fine. The police are good at stuff like keeping white people from driving drunk, and sure that’s good, but society still got by better than it is today when driving around drunk wasn’t a big deal. Most Europeans just walk home drunk because they didn’t have to spread out to flee blacks. There’s often nowhere to park in front of their drinking establishments anyway.
The police are here to deal with black people. When Jason Aldean came out with his controversial small-town ballad, it was hilarious because everyone knew he was referring to the inhuman criminal pastimes of blacks, including blacks who flipped out because they knew he was specifically referring to them:
“Sucker punch somebody on a sidewalk
Carjack an old lady at a red light.”
He might as well have just written: “Don’t let the sun go down on you in my small town, n-words. Nooses ain’t meant for hangin’ empty from trees.” The sentiments conveyed would’ve been the same. That’s what the whole uproar was really about. I don’t advocate lynching or any form of extrajudicial violence, as a disclaimer.
Back on track, the reason America has these systems to deal with blacks is that they can’t deal with themselves because they’re not genetically coded with the innate capacity for civilization.
We’re told their demonstrable lack of civilizational capacity is the result of all sorts of terms for racism, white supremacy, not given enough resources, and the legacy of slavery, but really, it’s rather simple. Sub-Saharan Africans have DNA from a pre-hominid ancestor not shared by any other race.
As a whole, this is probably what imbues them with a set of definitive traits such as poor intelligence, a lack of impulse control, an inability to think with a significant degree of abstraction or internal monologue, and a very short time horizon. These traits don’t result in a civilization. Without contact by other races, it constrains them to a hunter-gatherer existence. They’re programmed to be fine with that, which is the same reason that white people assume blacks are stressed out from all the shootings. In reality, they’re not, which is why they shoot so much. This existence would stress (product of a longer time horizon) us out for the same reason we don’t shoot each other for no good reason.
This wide genetic disparity also gives them some distinct physical features which is why AI can confuse them with apes because it’s just doing math on facial points. That’s why it’s so cringe when white conservatives claim they don’t consider that someone is black. This is impossible, their brains are automatically performing pattern recognition and recognizing them as alien. I had one flip out on me once at a barbeque when I casually noted that random blacks had been calling my phone. He became indignant and inquired how I could have known they were black and threatened to report me to my CO.
It was initially considered that blacks were a species of ape by Christians, Muslims, and Jews, but eventually the Catholic Church declared them human because it was determined that they possessed a degree of spiritual capacity. In the South, some slave owners would let them attend church while others wouldn’t, deeming it of no relevance to them. Everybody has to make up their own mind on these religious matters.
There’s this other canard about how American slaves weren’t taught to read because then they’d revolt after developing their intellectual potential that I’d like to address. If reading would’ve been of no utility to their labors, and if after years of modern public schooling many of them still can’t read, why would race-realist slave owners have bothered?
Literate slaves were common in civilizations of antiquity. In the Islamic world, a slave might serve the function of a prime minister. In Roman times, literate slaves might be privy to the highest matters of state or tutor the children of the elite. Nearly every mother of the Ottoman sultans was a slave. Our slaves were treated the way they were because of the traits previously outlined.
Being a slave or free wouldn’t change these traits, which, as I’ve noted, are genetic. In these other civilizations, there were also distinctions, often rather grim, in how black slaves were treated compared to slaves from other races. In contrast, we were often downright egalitarian. For example, whites were shipped on the same ships by the same companies using the same packing methods all the way down to Australia from Britain and no blacks were subjected to genital amputation.
Kingdoms like Nubia, Kush, and the fabled Mansa Musa are cited as evidence of African civilization. In reality, blacks were held as large slave populations. It would be like saying an antebellum plantation was an African agricultural operation because hundreds of blacks were working the fields. I could get into the Moors and the Pyramids nonsense. Sometimes it’s fun, but it feels rather tiresome today.
So, the long-winded point I’m making here is that nobody is going to impose a degree of civilization on them, they can’t do this for themselves even if they felt so inclined, which collectively, they don’t. Thus, bad actors who hate Christ can weaponize them to undo the civilization in which they’re currently located in the name of racial justice and equality. This is our current predicament.
Therefore, I’d like to note that although blacks aren’t adept at logic, there’s an escalatory logic to their civilizational dysfunction: it will just get worse until things fall apart. In this regard it’s no different from the trannies and wars or any other aspect of the evil madness that drives our persecutors.
I’m not an idealist who thinks the ship will be turning around, but in preparation for coming out of the other end of calamity, I think it would be useful to point out that blacks are behaving the way they are, because that’s who they are. Conservatives will talk about the content of your character and platinum plans, so that’s why our dissident content sphere is obligated to point out cold reality and common sense.
I was just trying to remember why I brought this topic up today. It was because I watched a few minutes of the new Resident Evil series last night which turned out to be about black scientists. I’m not sure where I’m rambling, but things aren’t going to improve through leniency or giving them free stuff and privileges at our expense.
If we’re not going to enforce most laws against them either, the concept of separation actually becomes quite reasonable. People would just naturally do that anyway if we weren’t subjected to decades of black weaponization schemes.
I’d ask these conservatives if they’d like to be able to shop at stores or not? Would they like to eat a stray round or not? Would they like to be sucker punched on a sidewalk or not? Would they like their elderly mother carjacked at a red light or not? Alright then, there’s only one solution.
Practical solutions are important, while utopian idealism is unhelpful. In that scenario, I’d have these conservatives rounded up, too. They’d desperately wish they were receiving the black treatment.
I’m proud to officially announce my candidacy for the office of Dogcatcher.
“If to produce the greatest number of great and good men, and good and gentle women, in proportion to her white population, of any Christian nation on earth, is civilization, then, if our reading of history is not at fault, the South stands first amongst the nations of the earth. (The white population! We love the word whiteāit is a sweet, beautiful word, made doubly dear by the efforts of the negrophilists to blacken it.) p. 286. The emissaries of hate and ruin have succeeded in making broad and high āthe middle wall of partitionā between the races. Fortunately, or unfortunately, you were born white and you will be more respected, (excuse the pun), if you do not desert your color.” p. 170.
D.H. Hill, āIs the South Sunk in Barbarism?ā Vol. 1 / āEditorialā, Vol. 4 āThe Land We Loveā,
Ancient Christians were wrong to initially consider blacks to be a species of ape. Apes are relatively peaceful and much more intelligent than negroes. I recently watched PLANET OF THE APES with Charlton Heston and was impressed by the productive and orderly agrarian civilization that the apes had built for themselves. Unlike humans, the apes were smart enough to secure their borders too. The Lawgiver warned them about man so the primates segregated and founded a Confederacy of Apes.
I was told the original novel of which the Planet of the Apes was based on was written by a Frend racial nationalist as a metaphor of a world ruled by Blacks.
From the O.P.:
I hate to be the one to dipute the point, but this is demonstrably false. Compulsory public schooling in America was a radical northern idea – of, by and for radical, and future radical, northern whites; it was an idea the Old South and her leaders wisely deprecated and rejected out of hand. While it might not have been its original purpose, it soon became its purpose, or, rather, the purpose of its strongest advocates nonetheless, to, as Dr. Dabney explains in one place among several others:
There is a reason I cited John Ransom’s Andersonville diary as a prime example of what Dr. Dabney describes in that quote in my last article – it is filled, front to back, with open hatred of all things Southern, especially Southern whites, of bald-faced lies and of Constitutional heresies. I could cite others that are, in some important respects, even worse, but I’ll save them for another time.
Anyway, my point is that, contrary to what you wrote in the above quote, it’s a lot more accurate to say that ‘training northern whites in bald-faced lies, in hatred of the South and in constitutional heresies – turning their brains to mush, and their hearts to stone; of overthrowing the original constitution and subjugating the South to Northern rule, is the original reason we have these systems.’ Moreover, that is precisely the reason we have them today – to turn the hearts of impressionable white sons and daughters against their fathers and their fathers’ fathers, and to perpetuate constitutional heresies, especially amongst so called “conservatives” in the vaunted ‘Party of Lincoln.’
You’re right to say whites don’t need public schooling, but the problem is that modern whites *think* they need public schooling on the whole. This idea comes from decades of systematically beating the brains out of them (in the public schools and elsewhere) making them believe the absurd when their former good sense would have taught them better. As I’ve said before, “thank God my public education didn’t take.”
Good article otherwise, though.
Since you bring up genetics, thereās a few interesting things to point out about American negro breeding over the generations. A lot of positive breeding was actually taking place during the antebellum period, but it took a nose dive during the post-Reconstruction years as the blacks began to urbanize. This appalled many Whites who noted the poor breeding, belligerence, and lack of manners displayed by urban negroes.
Funnily enough, social segregation actually reversed some of this damage by forcing the blacks into a situation in which they would have to construct their own social hierarchy. This in turn created a social stratum in which positive breeding practices were occurring, and the overall genetic quality, and thereby competence and civility, improved.
What we have now is multiple generations of compounded, rampant, unmitigated ill-breeding, most likely in-breeding, and drugs among inner city blacks since the 1960ās. This definitely aināt a recipe for success.
Get the Balkanization of America conversation going YESTERDAY! We need and deserve an all white enlarged CSA II and we can achieve it mostly peacefully by vote. Most libtards and many blacks will vote “yes” especially when they see they get “their own” all black Republic too. ( Southern California can be their Republic. ) Furthermore, even many in the deep state will help massage it into existence even though it’s for their own reasons … it’s worth it.
We just must very carefully look ahead and plan ahead so we don’t let the deep state get even a tiny foothold in our new Mayberry / 1950’s America / Super Switzerland.
I always thought an Ethno-State should be like Iceland in homogeneity, like Orania in exclusiveness, and like Switzerland in terms of actual sovereignty of the people.
You wrote:
Not only that, but we must begin from a position of strength, even dominance. Otherwise we’ll just be going through the motions and setting ourselves up for defeat. What I’m mostly getting at is spiritual and military stength. I’ll remind all that the failure of our forbears to build a navy resulted in the north’s easily blockading us by sea and slowly but surely bleeding us dry. In his Stonewall Jackson biography, Dr. Dabney shares an exchange he had had with that great general in which he (Dr. Dabney) predicted the South would be defeated simply because the hearts of the Southern People were not fully onboard with Southern independence and dissolution of the union. Jackson said to this that if Dr. Dabney’s prediction proved to be right, he did not wish to live to see it. Which of course he didn’t, and which I believe was an act of Divine mercy. But that is really beside the point of what I’m getting about. I wish it were as simple as what you seem to believe, ST, I really do, but it isn’t that simple from where I sit. That doesn’t make me a fed or a troll, it just makes me a realist.