What It Means To Be A Republican

It is comical how bad the Republicans are. Especially recently. A decade ago, they at least pretended to occasionally do things for their constituents.

Now, we have outright stolen elections, a legitimate invasion at the border, and an administration actively trying to get us into a World War III. Meanwhile, the Republicans are not only doing nothing positive – they are actively supporting all three, while simultaneously campaigning in favor of gay marriage and immigration.

They actively support everything that we hate, while resisting things that would provide even the slightest benefit to the American people.

As the saying goes, “You can’t afford a $5 billion border wall, but you can afford $100 billion to Ukraine to start World War III.

That really is what it means to be a Republican today. To support a bunch of schizo freaks as they loot your country and destroy your people.

The system is hopelessly corrupt. It is probable that the situation is so dire that the Republicans that honestly get elected are only allowed to do so by the uniparty to keep up appearances.

We’ll see how much longer that goes on, as more and more people are no longer buying it.

But no one can do anything about it. So, not as much need for the uniparty to stay in the dark.

Christendom never looked so promising.

The Republican system is a failure. To then support that system is nonsensical. The party that takes their name after it, hoping to conserve it, has conserved nothing. The system is as much of a failure as the party that allowed that system to fail.

At the end of the day, what it means to be a Republican is simple:

You blindly support the Red Team in the greater multicolored Babylonian uniparty.

-By Kaisar

4 comments

  1. Truer words were never written. I wrote to Cindy Hyde-Smith (R) – Mississippi, not too long ago, urging her to write Klaus Schwab (of WEF notoriety) , to inform him Mississippi will not be participating in his Great Reset. We will continue to use gasoline and diesel-powered vehicles, eat beef, and own private property long after he is dead and rotting. Good luck getting your Republican tax-parasite (drawing $174,000 a year off OUR income taxes) in the District of Corruption to give a specific response to a letter. Here was her response, which is the typical NON-RESPONSE I always get from Mississippi Republicans:

    Dear Mr. Powell:

    Thank you for your recent correspondence. I appreciate your reaching out to me.

    As your United States Senator, I view public service to be one of stewardship, with care and a commitment to serve the people of Mississippi in Washington.

    Having the benefit of your views is important to me.

    1. Mr. Powell, I wholly believe this is the sort of “form letter” response I would receive today from my elected representatives in Washington, should I make the mistake of contacting any one of them on any important matter. Hence, my refusal to do so, or to acknowledge (dumb*ss) encouragements to do so. There was a time, however, and I distinctly remember it, when our Washington politicians and their staffers did indeed pay some semblance of attention to our written concerns. This was easily provable by the mere fact that someone within their offices would occasionally write back, in the name of the Congressman or Senator in question, citing specific concerns contained in our letters, and their positions on same. But, that was then and this is now. If I received the sort of form letter from one of my representatives you quote in your comment, I’d be “fit to be tied.” And this is chief among the reasons why I choose not to engage the process at this date.

      True story: I once wrote to one of our U.S. Senators complaining about his support for placing foreign “refugees” within our State’s borders. He (or at least someone in his offices) shortly wrote me back to the effect of, ‘you’re not even in my district; why are you writing to me about this?’ “Uh, because your position on this issue affects ALL Oklahomans, including my kith and kin who in fact DO live in your district! Duh!” …

  2. As quite a few folk here already know, it my not do much good to write those to whom we pay exorbitant amounts. However, I use the contacting of those ((public servants)) to be simply a PITA to them, and remind them that there are those amongst us that are actually paying attention. I’m an olde phartt – I DO remember America! It’s was on life support a long time, but has been dead for some time now. It lives on in (some) of our hearts though – with a fire unquinched! The only one I’ll be kneeling to is above – it sure as @$%&*( ain’t anyone on this Earth! Rant over.

    Y’all Take care,
    Mike.

  3. Correct, contacting a congresscritter or senator would only be beneficial if they received 20,000 – 30,000 such letters, which ain’t gonna happen. The entertained citizenry is much more interested in who wins the college football playoff and the Stupor Bowl than confronting the criminals in DC. I contacted Mike Ezell, the newly-elected congressman in my district in Mississippi, and told him to oppose the idiotic proposal by South Carolina congressman Wilson to install a permanent bust of Zelensky in the capital.
    He (his aid) responded with the usual form letter, but when I followed that response up with a rebuke for not telling me where he stood on this, he responded that ‘he is just getting settled into his office, and he will respond more specifically later.’ Sure, he will. Now, if I had been a big-money donor to his campaign, I would have received a phone call from him. Of course I didn’t contribute one cent to his or anyone else’s campaign.

Comments are closed.