Escalation is the logic of just about every problem we decry as rightwing dissidents. That’s how we’re now on mass death via experimental gene therapy and World War 3. None of us were warning about this insanity just a few years ago. It’s what makes the conflict in Ukraine so dangerous and relevant.
Zionist military debacles escalated across the Arab world into a final Saigon-style humiliation in Afghanistan. Literally the exact same people set up the situation in Ukraine, while these previous debacles were still in progress. This is unbeknownst to the general public. Despite all the lies and failures thus far, the average American will still be shocked at how this is going to end because these lies are really that outrageous.
What’s Russia’s endgame on the battlefield?
It’s beginning to look pretty clear. Russia will finish securing what it deems necessary in the east and take the Black Sea coast and Odessa (heavily Russian) as well. Cutting off all sea access would make it much harder for the U.S. to ever facilitate another proxy war.
Additionally, a Korean-style DMZ will be imposed on a failed Ukranian rump state except this one will be 100 kilometers wide. It will protect the new areas of Russia from what remains of Ukraine because the West doesn’t see bombarding contested ground as an act of war. The Ukrainian government has deliberately killed thousands in these areas by shelling since 2014 and openly brags about it. They’d never be able to do that again and any missile launched would have plenty of time to be intercepted.
What’s clear to the Russians now is that no negotiation can take place that would be conducted in good faith. The Minsk Accords would have prevented all of this essentially by giving autonomy to the Russian regions of Ukraine. They were pushed by Germany and France who seemed credible to the Russians because they had zero security interests in Ukraine and catastrophic economic losses to suffer from a conflict.
As it turns out, they were lying their asses off at the behest of their master, Uncle Sam. Angela Merkel has recently come out and admitted that there was never any intention of honoring the agreements. The purpose was to buy time to prepare Ukraine for war. Thus, it would appear the Russians will impose a lasting solution by force. The demarcation described above would definitely do the trick.
Who’s assuring us that the Russians are losing?
Just as the stakes are exponentially higher than previous conflicts, so is the level of official dishonesty, gas-lighting and projection. If you consume mainstream media, the expert analysis is driven by narratives put out mainly by the Institute for the Study of War (ISW). The board includes the usual neocons like Bill Kristol and their lackeys such as General Petraeus. It’s run by the husband and in-laws of Victoria Nuland, who overthrew the Kiev government in 2014. From their site:
Dr. Kimberly Kagan founded ISW in May 2007, as U.S. forces undertook a daring new counterinsurgency strategy to reverse the grim security situation on the ground in Iraq . Frustrated with the prevailing lack of accurate information documenting developments on the ground in Iraq and the detrimental effect of biased reporting on policymakers, Dr. Kagan established ISW to provide real-time, independent, and open-source analysis of ongoing military operations….
These are the same people behind The Project for A New American Century, which made the case for the Iraq invasion. It was dissolved in 2006 after the endeavor turned into a nightmare and people started pointing out there was something peculiar about their background. Under this new brand, they pushed for a genius solution to salvage their Zionist plot, which turned into another spectacular failure. Noticing a pattern yet?
Get a load of this, he’s also on the board:
“In providing rigorous, non-partisan, and timely analysis, ISW plays a vital and valuable role in support of the critical missions our military is leading abroad.”
Senator Joseph Lieberman (ID-CT)
Projection is the axis of dishonesty for much of their propaganda. The military situation is no different than when they say we’re supremacists motivated by hate with genocidal ambitions. They always accuse you of being who they truly are and what they’re actually doing. That’s why they started this war eight years ago, and when it kicked into full swing, they started shrieking that Putin just started “a war of choice.”
At the same time, they kept asserting that the Russians would run out of munitions in a matter of days. Even the Secretary of Defense was parroting this Kagan canard. In reality, NATO has neither the stocks nor military industrial production capabilities to supply Ukraine much longer. The U.S. could sustain a conflict and prop up a puppet regime against 80,000 insurgents in Afghanistan but not a modern war on a scale unseen since 1945. Ukraine had an economy more than ten times that size. Nobody can afford to subsidize it wholesale for long.
Measuring Progress
Does taking ground represent victory? Usually yes, but not on open terrain devoid of strategic value. On the vast steppe, taking advantage of superior firepower and mobility to hit your enemy as he moves forward in vain attempt to strike you is a much smarter tactic.
The dumb thing would be to hold your ground and negate this decisive advantage. Ownership of the ground is decided later by your enemy’s defeat. This was a signature tactic of the Mongols. It works even better with pre-sighted heavy artillery. The Russians have been practicing this ever since the invasion of Phase One concluded.
Again, we see the projection where the ISW is saying that Russian conscripts are being slaughtered en masse in human wave attacks when this is what NATO is forcing Ukrainians to do in order to get headlines about the Russians retreating. The Russians aren’t even using conscripts. The recent 380,000 man mobilization came from volunteers and their version of the Individual Ready Reserve.
The Ukrainians have been sustaining horrific losses. EU President Ursula Von Der Leyn recently came out and gave a figure of 100,000 combat deaths. This comports with the 60,000 estimate that Defense Minister Shoigu gave back in September considering the fighting that’s taken place in the interim. The Russians have admitted to about a tenth of that, which sounds plausible if one understands their tactics.
Three or four wounded for one killed are often the ratios. So, there could easily be 400,000 casualties or higher since most of them are the result of artillery saturation. The Ukrainian army (navy and air force are basically wiped out) is in very bad shape. A heavily-conscripted force now has to be reinforced with thousands of mercenaries who don’t comprehend what they’re getting themselves into while orders are often enforced by the extremist units.
Kherson
The head of the operation, General Surovikin, has stated repeatedly that destroying the Ukrainian military is his primary objective. The Russians evacuated Kherson to avoid being trapped in a static fight with their backs to a river in the flood zone of a dam. They’d take unnecessary heavy casualties going head-to-head with everything NATO could send at them.
Prior to this decision, President Vucic of Serbia warned that NATO was going to turn the place into another Battle of Stalingrad. Days before Zelensky’s publicity stunt downtown, Russian forces, along with anyone who wished to leave, were pulled east, back across the Dnieper River. They even took the statues with them.
The West tries to market this as the result of yet another counter offensive that broke the Russian lines and forced them to flee with Ukrainian fire to their backs. This never happens. The line of contact between Russia and Ukraine is enormous. It could stretch from the Baltic coast of Germany to the bottom of the Italian peninsula. There’s no solid line, but often garrisoned points stretched far apart.
Donbass
This has been a highly fortified region since the Soviet era and NATO had eight years to turn it into an even bigger fun house. This Ukrainian version of the Maginot Line isn’t far outside of the city of Donetsk which is why the civilians there keep getting shelled. It’s difficult to make a dent in these defenses with artillery, and suicidal to rush them head on.
The heaviest fighting has been taking place here the entire time. These “counter offensives” for headlines to the north and south are mostly where most of the withdrawal plus artillery saturation battles are being fought on open ground. Besides Mariupol, whose capture connected the new republics with Crimea, the Russians have little imperative for urban combat unless it’s in Donbass.
It’s absolutely brutal fighting. When you see news about Wagner Group using convict volunteers and crushing their skulls with sledgehammers for desertion, this is the place. Unlike soldiers, they aren’t allowed to surrender or retreat and are provided with two reserve grenades for that purpose. It’s a Russian tradition and a better deal than they got in WW2.
Bakhmut has been turned into a sort of Verdun for Ukraine, where even the Western media has to admit they’re suffering hundreds of casualties per day. They try balance this by claiming the Russians are taking the same but that’s doubtful due to the firepower differential. At some point, key nodes like Bakhmut in this interlocking defensive system will fall and the disintegration will pick up pace.
The Air War
It would be expedient to flatten the defenses with bombers dropping massive thermobaric and bunker buster bombs. However, the Russians are extremely wary of what the Ukrainians have to the rear, principally S-300 batteries. They inherited hundreds of them from the Soviet Union. Thus far, air strikes on Ukraine are carried out by lofting, a technique in which fighters fly to the perceived edge of an AA zone, launch their ordnance and do a U-turn as they deploy flares. In Syria, U.S. and Israeli F-35s are stuck doing the same procedure thanks to these same Soviet systems.
The problem for Ukraine is that they can’t produce more and anything available from NATO has already been provided. They can’t produce more missiles for the systems, either. One objective of massive Russian cruise missile barrages is to drain the country of such AA missiles. That’s one reason why they’re accompanied by old ones without warheads used as decoys. The Russians might eventually become confident that Ukrainian AA has been mostly suppressed. They could then do what the Americans did to Iraq.
Humanitarian Catastrophe
Russia has some serious constraints on how much of the Ukrainian energy grid it can knock out since a couple nuclear power plants are involved. Still, they can carry out regular strikes to make sure less than half the country has electricity at any given time. That means no reliable drinking water, no heating, and no flushing toilets – combine that with mass casualties returning from the front and afflicted with the aliments that brought death back home with soldiers from the trenches of the Great War. If you’re not familiar, it’s worth reading up on because that’s what Ukrainians are facing.
Whatever it is you do for a living, ponder how you could get by doing it if you only had electricity half the time or less. What if the dollar was inflating at 20% and you couldn’t exchange it for anything, anywhere? Considered in its totality, this is the foundation of a refugee crisis unseen since 1945.
The modern economy of Europe developed around a supply of cheap Russian energy and raw materials. It can’t function indefinitely without them, so now Europeans are facing situations where industries would have to be shut down and relocated to the U.S. (many are furious and say this is on purpose) and rolling blackouts endured. Many won’t be able to afford to heat their homes. Considering how bad the parasitical migrant situation has already become since 2015, do you think the borders will stay open?
What was the point of this nightmare?
Here’s the gist: the Zionist grand strategy was to overthrow the government of Ukraine back in 2014 in order to foment a domestic conflict between the Ukrainian military and Russian proxy militias. With NATO’s backing, these breakaway militias would be crushed by a vastly superior national army. While the threat of sanctions would deter direct Russian intervention, its support for the militias would be used as justification for sanctions to collapse its economy. Once implemented, it was estimated this would happen almost overnight.
Then, the conflict and color revolutions would be moved into the Russian Federation as a means of overthrowing the Moscow government and breaking it up into controllable entities with 72 trillion in proven resources. That would make it much easier to strangle China and knock off client states of the duo, like Iran. Viola! Global domination is achieved, as promised in a certain evil text. Nothing but an asteroid could imperil human rights, freedom, and democracy ever again. This is vital to our national security, of course.
How it started/How it’s going
Just like all their other plans since the end of the Cold War, it’s backfired and they’ve got no feasible concept for getting it back on track. After Plan A failed, the new strategy was to back Ukraine as much as possible in the hope the Russian economy would eventually implode. That’s clearly failed as well. Russia is actually running a large budget surplus due to energy sanctions driving prices up. They lie about everything all the time. The only truth you can get out of them is through the projection. If they’re saying Ukraine can prevail in a conventional military conflict, that means they know there’s no way that could ever possibly happen.
These aren’t the tribe members who engaged skillful behind-the-scenes manipulation to instigate the Opium Wars, or the diabolical long-term chess game required to establish the state of Israel. They’re a bunch of hacks who are able to operate without the slightest accountability or mainstream criticism of who they are and what they’re doing. In other words, they’re just as evil, but far more reckless and incompetent. Their predecessors swindled sovereignty from their host populations, whereas they’re squandering it.
Ukraine was the center of the infestation. This part of the world is where these people came from (Kaganovich to Kagan, for example). If an Orthodox priest showed up to a meeting of the ISW and pulled out a crucifix, they’d probably recoil like vampires. Advancing their agenda by getting Slavs to slaughter each other is a delightful proposition. A pathological hatred and fear of Slavs is ingrained in them, perhaps genetically. Without this context, one can’t fully explain why they could do something this idiotic. The best anyone outside our media sphere can do is to call them neocons.
The End?
There’s nothing in the history of Ukraine that shows them to be cowardly or incompetent soldiers. This tragic episode is no different. It’s likewise with the Russians. From an attrition perspective, things could grind on for a few more months. Perhaps Russia could use its mobilization to do something dramatic like cutting Kiev off from Poland to force a quicker end.
It could be that they don’t even want to get involved with the chaos that’s going to unfold in western Ukraine and the mobilization is to secure the Russian areas after everything falls apart, which would be a highly manpower-intensive task. In a war, the losing side is often able to hold things together until the moment it can’t. Hopefully, the slaughter and suffering ends as soon as possible. Or, maybe this spirals into the next World War.
I’m proud to officially announce my candidacy for the office of Dogcatcher.
This is OUTSTANDING work, Tom!
I often think Identity Dixie writers are superior authors who would have been writing articles for mainstream publications in the 1960s and 70s – when the world was saner. Articles like this prove my point.
God Bless,
Padraig Martin
I’ve been following these events pretty closely since February 24 (thus am more familiar with the situation than about 98% of Americans, I’d say), and I agree with Padraig: An EXCELLENT summation. Thanks; I’m bookmarking to send to friends who might want to know what’s actually happening.
Interesting how YKW so closely exemplify Vox Day’s 3 Laws of SJW:
1. SJWs always lie.
2. SJWs always double down.
3. SJWs always project.
As you point out, the projection part is almost uncanny. One might think “they always accuse you of what they are doing” is an oversimplification, but it’s really, literally, always true.
Third. If someone or other had asked me twenty-four hours ago how I thought this would all go, my “pat answer” would have been, “don’t get me to lying.” I’m still not sure how it will all play itself out, but your article has given me some good insights. I’ve known all along it was a bad idea for us to get involved with this mess. Were it possible to do so, I’d “thump the heads” of the major “American” players in all of this. Since that isn’t possible, I suppose I’ll have to be satisfied with thumping the heads (so to speak) of their idiotic followers. But, I mean, today’s news is yesterday’s news and all that. Human Stupidity reigns supreme, no matter what.
Mr Morris, not only did America get involved, those in power in the wicked federal government actually helped to get it kick-started back in 2014, instigating the coup against the Ukrainian president Yanukovych (who had congenial relations with Russia) and installing the puppet/comedian in his place. All to try to bleed the Russians dry, and to grant more billions in profits to the war profiteers, which is the main motive. The war profiteers help to finance congressional re-election campaigns in every state, and every congressional district. And we taxpayers are forced to actually foot the bill.
This is exactly the clarity that people need to hear from credible sources.
The where , when, what , and why of how journalism was once conducted.
👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻