Confidence Brooks No Contradictions

The level of confidence in one’s moral orientation on a matter is often inversely proportional to his knowledge of it. If this is the case, the disparity is even greater in terms of the ability to consider it in a systemic, critical fashion.

Sometimes, that can be hilarious. I used to cover hate hoaxes before our great deplatforming. It was the same arc every time: ridiculous incidents done by POCs against themselves trigger mass outrage and passionate rhetoric by officials until the truth is acknowledged. It doesn’t emerge since it’s obvious the whole time. For example, Joseph Goebbels didn’t go around drawing misshapen swastikas with his own feces. The 2015 Mizzou meltdown is my all-time favorite. But, that was an era of fun and games.  

Can this perverse and pervasive element of the human condition be harnessed to destroy civilization on a global scale? Whoever got this COVID dystopia underway either did it to answer this question or they’re satisfied that it’s already answered, which is why they did it. I’m worried it’s the latter and here’s why: I’ve never met a white liberal with pretensions of sophistication who didn’t uncritically buy every single aspect of global warming marketed to him. Sometimes when I’m drinking, I just make stuff up and they agree because they assume it’s the official narrative and I’m one of them who wouldn’t just be making stuff up. That’s how the science works.

Likewise, they’ve never expressed unease that the narrative was enforced with censorship, coercion, and bribery or that it changed from global warming to climate change or that any other contradiction indicated anything suspicious at all. So, it makes sense as a proof of concept exercise in advance of dangerous experimental injections.

Last week, I was exposed to this segment. It’s about a guy who looks like an AIDS patient “roasting the ways people put misinformation above real science by real researchers and actual doctors”:

• They’re not scientists so they can’t do research;
• They have defective DNA so why should they care?;
• The above doesn’t apply to black people “who should do their research” ;
• If something was wrong with the vaccines “we would’ve heard some bad stuff”; and
• “The vaccines killed from what I can tell, none.”

His contention is that anti-vaxxers are the same species of anti-science cretins who persecuted Copernicus 500 years ago, burnt people at the stake, and aren’t qualified “to have opinions about facts.”

I was sipping beer on someone’s couch when this feeling of visceral disgust came over me at the sight of his emaciated, neurotic face. They were chuckling about how he was friends with Obama. None of this seemed to strike them as weird at all.

There’s a subset of comedy aimed at white people about other white people who find something objectionable about the vaccines. It could be argued that this is to distract them from considering the validity of having an objection. That’s partially true, because setting up strawmen is critical to running a successful psyop on white liberals.

However, the key contention about unvaccinated people is that we’re spreading the virus and killing vaccinated people who did their part. That sounds as idiotic as the logic of his comedy routine, but it’s true. It’s about dehumanizing us as murderers so they’ll tolerate the government starving us to death and having the nation plunged into dysfunction, while we decide that we don’t want to starve to death so we get vaccinated in order to go back to work and shop in a grocery store.

I’m not a theological expert or paragon of virtue by any stretch of the imagination, but lately I’ve been wondering about how the Calvinist concept of Double Predestination relates to these creatures. It postulates that just as God chooses who will be saved, he selects who will be damned. One can describe in rational terms about how they’re afflicted with a self-satisfied blindness to evil. The question of why only leads to suspicions about the provenance of this disease of the soul. Perhaps it is His mechanism.

At this point, it’s clear that they’ll buy into anything provided it’s framed to them in the proper context. They’ll feel good about themselves for accepting it the whole time. That’s all I’m really sure about.