Conservative-Liberalism Delenda Est

Conservative liberalism when taken to its logical conclusion will degenerate, disintegrate and destroy our culture. I mean what is left of it after losing every battle in the culture war for 70 years. It will also turn America into a gigantic shopping mall of foreigners and aliens who have nothing in common with the native population and who will soon be able to outvote them and seize control of the government. The GDP and the stock market will rise and the wealthy who are shielded from social decay in their gated enclaves will profit by owning most of the stock market while the suicide rate increases among the White working class. The goal of our movement is to vanquish precisely the thing – an ultra version of liberalism that is ungrounded, unrestrained and unbounded in anything meaningful – that conservative liberals want to conserve.

“Conservative” has become a pejorative word because it was claimed by these liberals. There is nothing substantially “conservative” about their worldview at all though and we can see the result all around us. We are burdened with massive insoluble social problems which are multiplying by the day largely because these people have been in power for so long.

Hunter Wallace, “The Heritage Foundation: The Problem of Nationalism

Mr. Wallace hit the nail on the head in the above quoted piece, “The Heritage Foundation: The Problem of Nationalism.” Included within Mr. Wallace’s article is an embedded YouTube video from the Heritage Foundation. In the video, an aged and forgettable conservative-liberal prattles on about the dangers of “nationalism.” Ask a normie conservative on the benefits of the Heritage Foundation and you’ll be met with a confused look, and for good reason. It’s essentially a dead and bygone institution, piloted by dinosaurs that think we’re still living in the Age of Saint Reagan. Of course, the same can be said of the National Review.

The moniker “conservative-liberal” is an excellent name for Conservative, Inc. and its various subsidiaries and agents. See, conservative-liberals aren’t rightwing, traditional, nationalistic or even conservative, especially on the social spectrum. They are liberals and only pay lip service to social conservativism, minus a half-hearted effort on pro-life issues. Conservative-Liberals controlled the House, Senate and Presidency not long ago. What did they accomplish? Certainly nothing to stop our social decay or demographic transformation. Instead, they utterly failed at reforming “healthcare.”

Their consistent and continued failure at conserving anything, besides our blood and our treasure, within our lifetime is naked evidence of their true nature and motivations. Tax cuts, corporate benefits, GDP growth, military spending, privatization of social programs and institutions, a barbaric invade/invite the world foreign policy, bizarre servitude to Israel, Chamber of Commerce worship and “Best for Business” attitude are the hallmarks of the conservative-liberal ideology. The key component missing is “our people.” People play no role within the conservative-liberal political paradigm because capital and abstract ideas are more important than a people. People are interchangeable units, devoid of a uniqueness or culture worth sustaining or preserving.

If you asked a conservative-liberal if a people should be preserved, they would likely be horrified by the question. They’d probably call you a Nazi or fascist for simply asking it. After all, they’re acolytes of the “magic dirt theory” and only evildoers of the 19th and 20th centuries had any affection for a “specific” people. In their mind, nationalism and, to a lesser degree, populism are the great twin evils of mankind; they are two ideologies that must be stamped out. Conservative-Liberals will always ally with true liberals in an effort to curtail nationalism and/or populism, see the 2017 French presidential election and “Against Trump” for recent examples.

Probably the most reviled conservative-liberal, at least among the Dissident Right crowd, is Charlie Kirk, as he is the embodiment of their anti-civilizational ideals. To quote Kirk from earlier this year, “I have loyalty to ideas…Of course I love the Grand Canyon. I love the Rocky Mountains. And I love Boston. And I love Chicago. But if all that disappeared, if all I had was ideas, and we were on an island, that’s America. That’s Israel. And that’s what people have to realize, America’s just a placeholder for timeless ideas. And if you fall too in love with, oh, the specific place, and all this…that’s not what it is. Israel would be the exception.” But of course, Charlie.

Ideas. Men don’t fight and die for ideas. They press on for their people and land – be it their survival or their freedom. They don’t fight for gay marriage, earned income credits, a foreign country, oil, tranny drag shows, Affirmative Action, limitless immigration, iconoclasm, their 401k, Marvel movies or cheaper Chinese products. However, they can be hoodwinked into giving their lives for those things under the banner of faux patriotism proposed by the conservative-liberal and true liberal alliance. Both need to be destroyed politically, but the conservative-liberal must be the first target.

Conservative-Liberalism is anti-truth because it denies the nature of man, genuine loyalty and benevolent stewardship. It is a bloodthirsty, avaricious, disingenuous and xenophilic ideology.

Ultimately, Conservative-Liberalism delenda est.

3 comments

  1. Very well said! I was a kid when Reagan was President. Other than that stupid amnesty, he has Little relevance today. I want to see Conservative Inc. die, with a stake thru the heart, and burned.

Comments are closed.