The “Groypers” (mostly a collection of Zoomers who follow Nick Fuentes, but with a few older/other folks tossed in) have declared a second Groyper War against the Trump campaign:
There is a solid article that stays relatively neutral on the declaration from Arktos. You can find it here:
Saving Trump: Fuentes Declares War on Campaign Leadership
Yesterday, America First influencer, organiser, and commentator Nicholas J. Fuentes, a rising star in America’s political landscape, made a public declaration of a new ‘Groyper War’ against the current Trump campaign. The announcement quickly trended on social media, sparking widespread discussion and generating headlines across various news outlets.
Watch the video of Fuentes’ declaration here.
Given the swift and intense reaction from some well-meaning commentators, it is clear that not everyone fully understands the significance of what is unfolding. This analysis aims to break down and explain the underlying moral and strategic reasons behind Fuentes’ declaration.
The Trump campaign of 2024, much like his 2020 campaign, is markedly different from its 2016 iteration — unfortunately, this change has been entirely to its detriment. The campaign lacks the energy and rebellious spirit that originally propelled Trump to victory. Instead of rallying the core demographic that secured his 2016 win, the campaign is now more mainstream, pandering to every conceivable group in society except for those who are actually voting for Trump. This shift towards placating fringe special interests rather than focusing on the core issues that resonated with his base has weakened the campaign’s effectiveness and alienated many of his original supporters.
Fuentes’ strategy of openly challenging the Trump campaign’s leadership and communication strategies is a calculated move with significant potential benefits. By taking this aggressive stance, Fuentes positions himself to claim credit in several potential outcomes. If the campaign stays on its current track and ultimately loses, Fuentes can argue that his criticism was justified and that he predicted the failure. Alternatively, if the Trump campaign makes adjustments in response to his criticism, he can claim that his influence was instrumental in steering the campaign in the right direction. Even if Trump were to win despite sticking to his current strategy, Fuentes could still assert that he and his supporters did everything they could to ensure victory, bolstering their credibility.
[…] (Read More at the link above)
Pretty quickly after the declaration, the total snake JD Vance condemned Fuentes:
Vance says he ‘disavows’ Nick Fuentes: ‘A total loser’
Republican vice presidential candidate, Sen. JD Vance (Ohio), said he “certainly” “disavows” far-right white supremacist Nick Fuentes, who criticized his wife, Usha Vance, for her Indian heritage, while arguing the best response is to “ignore” the attacks.
Fuentes, who dined at Mar-a-Lago with former President Trump in 2022, went after Vance and his family after he joined the former president’s reelection ticket last month.
“Who is this guy, really? Do we really expect that the guy who has an Indian wife and named their kid Vivek is going to support white identity?” Fuentes said of Vance last month.
When asked on CBS News’s “Face the Nation” about the comments, Vance said they “don’t have any room in the MAGA movement.”
“And of course – and of course Donald Trump has criticized this person. Look, I think the guy’s a total loser. Certainly, I disavow him. But if you ask me what I care more about, is it a person attacking me personally, or is it government policy that discriminates based on race? That’s what I really worry about,” Vance continued. “Is bad government policy that harms people based on their immutable characteristics. Look, a lot of losers are going to attack me and attack my family.”
I already wrote a piece on JD Vance here. He is and was a horrible choice for VP. These new developments of him hating on dissidents and spending all his time kneeling before Zionist/non-White interests since securing the nomination only further prove my points against him.
I sympathize with Fuentes here in recognizing that the Trump campaign is headed for disaster and has been completely subverted. Where I disagree is in the implementation of this Groyper War; I.e. in believing that this will make any difference at all. Trump is deep state owned or will be removed. There is no fixing his campaign. He was not pro-White as president before, he won’t be now.
If Arktos is correct, and Fuentes/Groypers are doing this war to hedge themselves for post-election, then it’s a great strategy. However, if they are genuinely attempting to reform a Trump/Vance ticket…Well, then I wish them luck in their near-hopeless endeavor. You can’t reform what was wicked from the start.
I sense that the reality going forward is this:
- Trump/Vance is the ticket for World War 3 and economic decline through Israel.
- Harris/Walz is the ticket for World War 3 and economic decline through Russia/China.
Regardless of your vote, you are getting World War 3 and economic decline. It’s just about selecting your preferred pathway to that same outcome, I suppose. Trump will patriotically march your sons and daughters off to war, whereas Harris/Walz will march them off to war with weird transgender monsters holding a gun to their back. Either way, they are off to the bombs.
And no amount of reform will change that reality. The deep state needs a war. They will get one.
Not an optimistic prediction, I know. But I am just saying it like I see it.
By God’s providence, I hope I am wrong and the Groypers are right.
A Christian, husband, father, and American dissident. Join him in seeking truth and sipping sweet tea during the collapse of the American Empire. You can find more of his work at hiddendominion.com. Eph. 5:11.
I’m sick of Trump pandering to the niggers and other anti-white minority groups.
The kids seem either completely converged into the hive as bugmen or the nihilism of the everything is fake and gay cynicism.
It is hardly the kids’ fault this is the world we leave them so I understand both are products of the time.
This seems to be the twisting of the knife or perhaps the longing for their own night of the pillow just as genXers like me have a rather visceral distaste for the gauche boomer civnat consumerism that helped land us here – even though boomers are just products of their time too.
The generational stuff is just for entertainment value really. Like memes of stereotypes we know to be true but reflect a world already gone. But useful shorthand is one of the few joyful comms we have left.
And with that we have these sorts of late stage clown world media flaps.
I find the whole groyper thing to be strange and postmodern. Social power from nowhere physical, which is very feminine. But that’s where we are: gelded social flexing.
But I did not grow up in some sexless techno utopia run by globohomo psychopaths and progressive schoolmarms so I have the luxury of having a foundation in the physical reality.
The long of it is with this whole awkward and forced orange man 2.0 we are seeing the last gasp of the Civnat. Which is sadly the end of heritage America as we know it.
But the kids don’t know it. They don’t know what they lost.
So the good of it is that the end of civnat is the end of one of the core mythologies of the “right”.
Which will need to end and will end with war but maybe just maybe war can be avoided for the harsh realities of nature batting last once again.
Fuentes is a cancer who has burned a bridge with every person he’s ever worked with. A good number of his followers are now brown Third Worldists. I would advise any right winger to stop taking him seriously.