Dead Internet Theory

Nearly everywhere you go on the internet, if you see “users” or “comments” engaging with one another, a significant chunk of it is 100% fake.

It is all being placed there to program you into believing a false narrative about what everyone else believes.

Here is one such example from Reddit (two different posts, two different time periods, two entirely similar comments sections) (right click -> view image for full-size):

All of those accounts are bots posting using Artificial Intelligence and programmed scripts. It is social engineering.

The same thing happens in most comment fields of mainstream news (even right-leaning ones like ZeroHedge or Epoch Times).

It even happens with Twitter (now X) accounts:

Top cybersecurity expert claims that more than 80 percent of Twitter accounts are probably bots

Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk on Thursday went after Parag Agrawal-led platform once again, after a top cybersecurity expert claimed that as high as eight in 10 Twitter accounts are fake.

Dan Woods, Global Head of Intelligence at cybersecurity company F5, who spent more than 20 years with the US federal law enforcement and intelligence organisations, told The Australian that more than 80 per cent of Twitter accounts are probably bots — a massive claim as Twitter says only 5 per cent of its users are bots/spams.

It’s all fake and gay to manufacture consent from the masses.

I bet there are about nine fake accounts for every one real account online nowadays. Those nine accounts manufacture the likes/favorites and ratios of what goes to the top. Meaning that everything that becomes “popular” ends up there by the strategic decision of the elites. From Reddit to YouTube to your weather websites to your local news and back. It hits everything.

This has been true for at least five years, likely about eight.

This isn’t news to some of you who have heard of Dead Internet Theory before. But for those of you that have not, I encourage you to dive into it.

good place to start learning is Wikipedia. They claim it is a conspiracy theory, which means you already know it is actually a conspiracy fact:

The dead Internet theory is an online conspiracy theory that asserts that the Internet now consists mainly of bot activity and automatically generated content manipulated by algorithmic curation, minimising organic human activity to manipulate the population. Proponents of the theory believe these bots were created intentionally to help manipulate algorithms and boost search results in order to manipulate consumers. Some proponents of the theory accuse government agencies of using bots to manipulate public perception. The date given for this “death” was generally around 2016 or 2017.

The dead Internet theory has gained traction because many of the observed phenomena are quantifiable, such as increased bot traffic, but the literature does not support the full theory. Caroline Busta, founder of the media platform New Models, was quoted in an article in The Atlantic calling much of the dead Internet theory a “paranoid fantasy”, even if there are legitimate criticisms involving bot traffic and the integrity of the internet, but she said she does agree with the “overarching idea”. In an article in The New Atlantis, Robert Mariani called the theory a mix between a genuine conspiracy theory and a creepypasta.

[…]

The dead Internet theory has two main components: that bots have displaced human activity on the Internet and that actors are employing these bots to manipulate the human population. The first part of this theory, that bots create much of the content on the internet and perhaps contribute more than organic human content, has been a concern for a while, with the original post by “IlluminatiPirate” citing the article “How Much of the Internet Is Fake? Turns Out, a Lot of It, Actually” in New York magazine. The second half of the dead Internet theory builds on this observable phenomenon by proposing that the U.S. government, corporations, or other actors are intentionally employing these bots to manipulate the human population for a variety of reasons. In the original post, the idea that bots have displaced human content is described as the “setup”, with the “thesis” of the theory itself focusing on the United States government being responsible for this, stating: “The U.S. government is engaging in an artificial intelligence powered gaslighting of the entire world population.”

They speak the truth, even if they shroud it in a “conspiracy theory” package.

The takeaway: Don’t believe a single narrative you read online. It’s all likely manufactured. The internet is fully compromised territory at this point. It’s only going to get worse with hardline, workable public AI now.

But hey, for us older folks, at least you got to enjoy a time when it wasn’t like this. When they were still training the bots. We saw all of this coming with the stupid Twitter “i hate texting” bot failures, but now the bots don’t have those public failures anymore. Not because they are gone, but because they are too advanced to catch most of the time now. They blend in too easily.

And at least you still have my website. I’m too small to be of any significance, so you know I’m not a bot. They push up their own, but I’ll always be in the background. If this website ever suddenly becomes mainstream, that is when you’ll know I’m compromised. The elites only let the bots and the gatekeepers to the top anymore. The rest of us share our own hidden hierarchy in the shadows.

It is sad but true: The golden era of the internet is over.

But on the bright side: This means you can stop demoralizing yourself by what you see in comments and articles online. Most of it isn’t even real, anyway.

8 comments

  1. Internet vs real life is a huge thing in 2024

    Like, I was a total basement dweller for close to a decade and assumed I was ugly and autistic and that’s why I had no social life

    But as soon as I stopped watching porn and started actually leaving my basement, I was very surprised at how open and receptive IRL Normies and women were towards my attempts to socialize

    This is especially true with the “extremely online” (look it up) game / PUA stuff you see a lot of ///our guys/// posting about, according to the “women only want hyper Chads” meme, I shouldn’t be able to get any dates because I’m 5’7” and have a bit of a recessed chin— IRL dating dynamics are VERY different than online ones

    Online basically no women are going to reply to me on Tinder or OkCupid because of my “manlet” height, but IRL I’ll actually have women approach or compliment me

    The Internet has COMPLETELY broken basically everyone under age 35’s brains 🧠 including formerly mine

    Like OP said, most of the stuff online and on the news is fake, just like the COVID-19 / lockdown narratives. They gaslit the normies into believing it because most people have the “social brain” instead of the “truth brain”, the latter of which is positively correlated with masculinity / androgen levels, which decreases mainly due to poor diet

    People in our scene are EQUALLY as susceptible to false narratives as the opposition— EG the LGBT 🏳️‍🌈 thing, IRL I don’t see any trans people at or near the local universities. Don’t believe for a second that 20% of Gen-Z are non-hetero

    To recap:
    > learn to socialize IRL and don’t use online dating or try to make “based online friends”
    > don’t debate politics in online forums, because “the libs” you’re owning could very well be bots. Rudolf Steiner actually wrote a whole essay in the 1920’s about why you shouldn’t be pen pals with people you’re never met before that’s actually more relevant today, a century later

    Just figured I’d post this semi-non-sequitor rant here because of how worked up people these days about the whole social decline / atomization / incel thing

    To paraphrase a saint: the psychological suffering of those living in the last days will exceed the physical suffering of martyrs in the first century. Everything online and on TV is a psy-op

    1. Great work on the life turnaround, brother. Always awesome to hear those kind of stories among our guys.

      Stay sane out there with all these psyops.

  2. I have a medium.com account. I write there often. I have read of AI and bots even appearing there.

    I had an idea. I wrote an article outlining my idea as to how people could tell it was *me* writing and not some AI/bot. I will infuse into my articles some southern slang! Southern Appalachian and general Southern words might could show the readers real good that I, the writer, is a real human being!
    It is, to me, plumb stupid to read a bot article telling me how to live and think.
    And feel!

    I will not have to worry until the AI and voice programs can do a southern accent very good!

  3. I very much enjoy this author. He’s giving Shackleford a run for his money.

    1. That is a tremendous compliment, thank you sir. But I do not think anyone can usurp Shackleford’s throne. He’ll always be the champ around here.

  4. Kaisar’s thesis is believable. If something is derided as a “conspiracy theory” at places like Wikipedia, it’s the strongest bit of evidence that in fact it’s a conspiracy *reality*. The synagogue of satan really do believe we’re gullible idiots.

    George Carlin had a thought on that: “Think of how dumb the average person is. Then realize that half the people are dumber than that.”

    It explains a lot.

    But I don’t get something regarding the example from Reddit: (two different posts, two different time periods, two entirely similar comments sections).

    The two posts cited have the same times and dates. ???

Comments are closed.