Perhaps America’s higher education system might benefit from the Henry VIII treatment received by the monasteries in England. I’m not coming at this from an anti-monastery or religious partisan perspective, but simply noting that nationalizing all of them and confiscating their assets could prove to be of utility.
In most of the world, university attendance is often determined by what degree one desires to pursue and then what institutions in proximity of their home offer this program. The concept of providing scholarships to play sports comes off as downright bizarre. To the extent that sports are played in a school capacity, these are clubs joined after enrollment, not professional teams with the players recruited specifically for this purpose.
Globally, there’s no shortage of professional sports available for public consumption. So, the rest of the world doesn’t have a connection in their heads between professional sports and school. Nobody has bumper stickers or vanity plates or any of this shit. The point is school, not a sport.
Nobody else is paying more than what they’d earn in a year after college to attend college. For instance, in Denmark, it’s free for students. If you live in a prosperous homogeneous country, the logic of limiting someone’s educational opportunities which could enhance his contribution to society because his family is poor comes across as highly flawed. He can contribute to funding the system when he’s working and paying taxes, this also applies to excellent technical training. Obviously, that’s not the case anymore but it was the idea when they set these things up.
Also, pretty much everywhere else the head of the university is a professor who’s transitioned into a leadership role for a time at an institution which isn’t very big by U.S. standards. Now, many in the United States are headed essentially by CEOs making money far in excess of their counterparts across the rest of the world. Please note this is as our system is increasingly churning out graduates with nothing to distinguish themselves from high school graduates except for insane levels of debt.
I speak to foreigners who are stunned by the American price tags and can’t seem to fathom why it would cost so much when this same service is provided at a high level so much cheaper elsewhere. I tell them I can’t fathom it either, but that it’s a sign America is heading towards collapse as these costs are unsustainable and track in a completely different direction from our declining standards of living, it’s just like healthcare and everything else. There are many opportunities for higher education abroad if you’re intrepid.
At Harvard, what we have is a scientist who studies the science of diversity. I’d never heard of her, but I think all of us would immediately know that she’d be totally worthless in any academic or intellectual capacity. In the real world, one produces revenue through the provision of goods and services or as the sales guy for such provisions. In academia, the irony is that a creature like this can bring in revenue by getting grants to study the science of diversity but, then again, Harvard has so much money that money probably isn’t even a concept, so I don’t know how to relate to what they’re thinking.
Harvard is one of the founding Anglo-Protestant institutions and recognized as the epitome of the elite. Just like the rest of America, Jews wormed in and took the place over quite a while ago. Most students there with white skin are actually Jewish and, of course, this is something that can’t be accounted for by academic merit. They’re not really that bright compared to the average White person, the ones proliferating these days are actually quite retarded, and Whites with elite IQs abound in exponentially higher numbers compared to Jews in the same categories.
The fact that elite academic institutions belong to them isn’t really any less nefarious yet easy to explain than what’s happened to the U.S. government. The notion that Jews prevail because they’re so smart and talented is laughable. They’re evil in ways that the rest of us aren’t and collude with each other in ways the rest of us don’t. As a result, they’ve amassed egregious wealth and everything in America is for sale. Not hard to grasp.
There was an art enthusiast who commented that if they’re able to score too big of a victory over the rest of us, the end stage for them would be consumption by their own madness. We’re pretty much on that stage now. Nobody in our political system represents us, so I don’t see things going any other way.
So, they’ve got this institution called Harvard which they’ve totally swindled from the original owners. Whites have been mostly diversified out of it, and the remainder of the capacity is there for the education and networking of elite Jews. This is how Mark Zuckerberg teamed up with Larry Summers and his network to swindle Facebook from its founders but at least they eventually won in court. Many such cases, in terms of swindling. This even includes the entirety of Russia, that Larry Summers connection is a whole other story.
Harvard has been diversified to camouflage Jewish ownership, but then this camouflage doesn’t want to praise a genocide happening in real time on global television or weep over a pile of shoes, so Jews freak out and call their dogs in Congress to foam at the mouth while other Jews hire Mexicans to drive around campus all day in trucks with electronic billboards to harass everyone. Meanwhile, billionaire parasite Jews organize to strangle the place, but they already gave it so much money that’s not possible because other billionaire Jews (Pritzker), who are doing tranny stuff, control this money and are panicked and don’t know what to do. Then, these parasite Jews will claim they’re “anti-woke” but this is all just one circle of Jewish insanity.
This, ladies and gentlemen, is The Madness of the Jew. Well, at least, what it looks like in a mild form. The above paragraph was me trying to summarize the situation as briefly as possible.
Jews cry out in pain as they strike you, this is peasant wisdom from a long time ago which modern people have trouble grasping. They’re currently carrying out a genocide they could halt at any time, while they’re wailing and shrieking with rage about how people want to genocide them. Objectively, this is extremely bizarre and there’s really no sophistry that could frame a plausible explanation for it.
When a rational mind realizes that what Jews are saying is that any opposition to Jewish activities is literally the same thing as the genocide of Jews, after surmounting the sheer insanity of this doctrine, it starts to wonder if all these claimed genocides might’ve been in reality simply opposition to Jews. Lies are dangerous to everyone, but eventually they pose the most danger to the liars.
Perhaps such a mind begins with speculating on the credibility of the claim that Hamas was putting babies into ovens, which was quickly debunked, and then wonders back on more incredible claims such as the murder of 6 million Jews, which could never be substantiated through fact or reason, the only connections to reality being the actual existence of German labor camps in World War 2 and 6 being the number of points on the demonic star that represents Jews. This one also involved a great deal of ovens. The fact this claim was made about the Russians 50 years earlier makes the figure all the more dubious.
A rational mind would deplore the genocide in Gaza, but then wonder why the Jewish strategy wouldn’t be to claim this genocide isn’t happening rather than claiming the genocide is what everyone wants to do to them when none of their opponents in the Middle East are trying to do it to them, let alone people on campuses in the U.S. objecting to the actual genocide the Jews are conducting.
Reason isn’t the lens by which one can understand Jews. But for starters, you can understand and predict their behavior through historical pattern recognition and the denial that words have objective meanings. Not that Harvard would cross the street for 4 million dollars, but at least this Claudine Gay creature didn’t steal that sum from this entity.
I’m proud to officially announce my candidacy for the office of Dogcatcher.
Thank you!
Of course! We aim to provide the best polemics on the internet.
Everytime I see news about Harvard’s “President Gay”, I always initially think it’s a joke before coming to terms that yes, in fact, that is her name; a rather fitting one, really, when you consider what they teach there lol.
Amateurs rob banks. Professionals manage banks and rob their customers. Sometime ago the Jews figured out that they could pool their money together, buy a university, and then use the school to issue an unlimited number of bogus diplomas to the younger members of their tribe. They also issue falsified credentials to diversity hires. However, the token blacks aren’t smart enough to realize how unqualified they are and often turn against their benefactors. It’s funny.
There is an invincible ignorance about university endowments. Well some, like Harvard’s, a very large in the aggregate, all consist of smaller gifts that can only be used for the donor-specified purpose. So the that established The XYZ Professorship in Vietnamese History cannot be used to provide scholarships for physics student, or, for that matter, for students of Vietnamese history.
Virtually the whole of any school’s endowment, including investment earnings, is encumbered and unavailable for other purposes. So while Harvard gets many nice things paid by its donors, the administrators must get monies from other sources for other purposes. As far as the administrators are concerned, the endowment is effectively zero.
That may be how the donors see it; but is that how the funds are administered? Money is fungible. Fund managers invest those funds in the same sort of places other large funds do, chasing returns. As long as the Vietnamese professorship remains, does anyone really care about the original donation that endowed it? What if their fund manager has a really bad year, and the endowment suffers a loss? Would the professorship be cut, or would undergraduate tuition simply be raised by double digits, which they routinely do anyway? And what happens to the evil slave owner’s donation when his name is removed posthumously from the building he paid for? Color me skeptical.
Yeah I’m aware of this, I used to donate to my alma mater for specific stuff before I got pissed off. I’m no stranger to a budget and I’d assume Harvard could find 1 or 2 billion to play around with but maybe not.