Connecting Ideologies

It’s long been my contention that there’s much more to glean about the foreign policy of the U.S. from the statements of its enemies than the platitudes of its officials and their string pullers. Here’s an excellent observation made by Bashar Al-Assad during an event for Syrian teachers:

Everyone you don’t like “uses chemical weapons.” A pattern, clearly.

The reason I pay attention to this rat-faced parasite is because among many other crimes, he wrote Bush’s Axis of Evil speech. He’s an influential spokesman for the people who control our foreign policy, leading us from one disaster to the next without accountability or authentic recognition of their identity. The average American seems to think (to the extent this ever happens) that different people are handling Ukraine besides the exact same ones behind Iraq and Afghanistan. I suppose that leads to the assumption this won’t end in disaster like everything else.

For any newcomers to our side of the spectrum, I’d like to point out that if these people don’t control our foreign policy than there should be a disparity between what they say and then what gets said by our officials. If our officials are installed by us through a democratic process to represent our interests, then why would they be saying things that don’t make sense and further an agenda that’s harmful to us?

The things that don’t make sense are as prolific as they are staggering in hypocrisy. Some egregious examples:

  • Claiming to oppose Islamic extremism while sponsoring everyone from Al-Qaeda to ISIS
  • Expounding on democracy as the highest virtue while overthrowing democratic governments the world over
  • Professing to treasure human life while killing millions
  • Decrying aggression while engaging in relentless aggression in pursuit of global domination
  • Claiming to represent a “rules-based international order” while breaking any rule or agreement that poses the slightest inconvenience
  • Discriminating against White men while wielding a war machine of White men
  • Touting religious tolerance while attacking governments more religiously tolerant than the U.S., such as Syria and Iran, while allying with Saudi Arabia
  • Peddling freedom while violently repressing peaceful dissent

The latest to enter the zeitgeist is claiming that fictional domestic Nazis are the premier threat to our national security. Simultaneously, they’ve been sponsoring a Neo-Nazi movement that’s killed literally thousands of civilians and providing them with enormous amounts of the most dangerous hand-held weapons available while proclaiming them freedom fighters for our values. This is in order to provoke a war with Russia, which we could easily win, so somehow that’s not the number one threat.

Guess who never does the fighting.

As Al-Assad pointed out, there’s a simple way to make sense out of all of it: they do whatever they think is useful at any given time without regard to what they did or will do at any other given time. There’s no objective rationale guiding this approach or coherent rhetoric to support it. That’s Zionism in a nutshell: do whatever is perceived useful to achieve the final goal without self-awareness, morality, or consideration of how it could backfire. From an epistemological perspective, this is the only straight line to draw through the insanity.

Their bullshit has no limit short of nuclear annihilation. Even as the Russians have everything they want encircled and are blowing up whatever remnants of the Ukrainian forces they decide need blowing up, these parasites are still pumping out breathless lies as if this effort could alter reality.

They’ve ended up proven wrong every time and it never matters to them. I’m starting to ramble so I’ll end by pointing out that if a puppet master has a hypothesis he wants to test, that offers some pretty good predictive value for what the puppets will do next. It’s a waste of time considering the negative consequences if you’re trying to make predictions.

3 comments

  1. The average American seems to think (to the extent this ever happens) that different people are handling Ukraine besides the exact same ones behind Iraq and Afghanistan.

    An elderly couple I used to know invited me to breakfast one morning early on during Obama’s administration. The wife was complaining about something or other the administration was pushing (maybe Obamacare, but I don’t recall for sure), when the husband finally spoke up and said to her, “everyone needs to just calm down about this; whatever he does we can repeal whenever he is out of office.” To which I literally almost choked on my bite of sausage. And, as you can well imagine, it was all I could do to “mind my manners.” I was able to, in that particular instance, exercise a great deal of self-restraint, keeping my mouth shut and my opinions to myself.

    The problem of course was that once Congress passes a piece of legislation of any significance at all, it is never repealed. My elderly friend was old enough to know that; I mean, I knew it, and I was barely more than half his age at the time.

    The extent that the average American “thinks” is just past his nose; no farther. Good post!

  2. I suggest David Frum, Bush, and Cheney hook up with Lindsey Graham, Salazar, Roger Wicker and Sean Hannity, and book the next flight to Kiev to fight alongside the Ukrainians; back up some of that badass talking they like to do.

Comments are closed.