Some idiot Yankees were recently arrested for their involvement in plotting to kidnap and murder the Governor of Michigan. Since the media at large is completely untrustworthy, due to both malice and breath taking incompetence, I found it necessary to read the indictment against the individuals. Unsurprisingly, the “news” reduced the story to “white man bad.” These types of articles and propaganda pieces are useless to us.
It is worth noting that while I insult those indicted, I do not make light of the crimes they are accused of. Conspiring to kidnap and murder someone is no laughing matter. Attempting to build bombs with plans to use them in acts of terrorism are not whimsical acts worth a chuckle. These are serious actions that show a dearth of malice on the part of those who commit them. I speak of these people humorously in order to make the discussion a bit more palatable and, frankly, they deserve a bit of mocking.
The indictment mentions paid informants and undercover agents, though the extent of their role in the affair is left a little vague. With all such incidents, it would not be surprising to learn these FBI employees did more than just passively witness others commit crimes of conspiracy. As with Ruby Ridge, several cases brought against motorcycle clubs, and some scattered incidents of the FBI catching a “rightwing terrorist just in the nick of time,” we will likely learn these FBI employees instigated, offered knowledge, and cajoled other members of the group to commit illegal activities. This does not remove the responsibility from those indicted. They were all adults who made choices that were not under coercion (that we know of) or duress. This should serve as a stark reminder that anyone who suggests, encourages or attempts to conspire to commit illegal activity is not to be trusted and likely collecting evidence for your future indictment.
It is a foregone conclusion that no matter what the political ends were for these people, they will be painted as rightwingers and thereby linked to anything remotely to the Right, conservative, nationalistic or traditional. We should not allow ourselves to fall into the trap of becoming angry at such things and defending these idiots. What we should do is denounce these degenerates for what they are (violent criminals) and learn from their foolishness, so that we do not make the same egregious and sinful errors.
There are several mistakes the dimwitted indictees made that we can learn from. Most obviously, they actually did illegal things. The importance of this aspect cannot be overstated. They broke the law on their own free will. How much they were cajoled, convinced or harassed by Federal employees is irrelevant unless they can unequivocally prove coercion or duress. The lesson – do not break the law, do not go along with people breaking the law. There is more than just the obvious unfortune of going to prison and ruining your life and the lives of those who depend on you.
There is the oft decried “optics” angle. Every negative act by someone on our side discredits everyone on our side. It is one more data point that will be used against the rest of us and will hamper any future efforts to recruit and gain acceptance in the mainstream. Some will say that worrying about optics is for cowards and weaklings. People who say such things are short-sighted, selfish, stupid, not interested in our side succeeding, and likely an employee of the Federal government. Anyone who is perfectly fine with making you and your cause look bad is not interested in you or your cause.
The second mistake we can learn from (as mentioned in a brilliant and informative piece on OPSEC by ID’s most attractive writer) is they conspired to commit crimes using social media and chat apps, aka “fedposting.” The lesson – do not fedpost. So closely related as to be considered a corollary is “do not allow others to fedpost unanswered.” At one point in the indictment, one of the Yankee twits is said to have posted in an encrypted chat app “what do we think about kidnapping?” and there was no response. I have zero doubt the lack of response in the group chat will be used against the other felons as tacit consent. Emojis and painfully obvious euphemisms were also used in encrypted chat group chats. How would the Federals know this was done unless these conversations were compromised? It is irrelevant how they got access to the conversations, be it through technical means or by one of the members of the chat copying the conversations. The conversations were compromised and we should assume conversations are always compromised.
Reading through the indictment in detail and pointing out each place where a tactical or moral mistake was made could be a series of articles in and of itself, but it is easily distilled into a simple point. Obey the law and obey your heart. God gave us each a moral compass and once we get through the initial rush of anger, most of us know what is right and what is not. Do not ignore your moral compass and ignore the Lord’s guidance to satisfy your anger.
There is law for a reason. Attempting to kidnap and murder a woman isn’t legal, in America or in the moral law of God, no matter the cause. What a stupid way to throw away your life. And if they had managed, all they’d do is make a martyr for the far left. We really just have to stick by our family and make them apable of being successful. America is finished, all we have left is our family and our faith.
This whole thing will disappear from the news quickly, since it didn’t happen in Alabama or Texas. Just like the Reno shooting, where the wrong kind of people got shot, in the wrong kind of state.
However, it will be instructive and amusing to watch the Yankees trip over their hypocrisy and double standards. Like they always do in these situations.
Well, probably the best advice one can give to persons who have a bent for doing such things (illegal and immoral stuff, and talking about it in the Panopticon that is social media), is to steer way clear of drugs and alcohol. All forms at all times. If they’re just incorrigibly stupid people whether they’re under the influence or not, there isn’t anything you or I or anyone else can do or say to these people that will make any difference. There is a very good reason someone long ago coined the adage, “you can’t fix stupid.” The guy in the photo to head your article looks to me like he suffers from at least a mild form of retardation. He probably should have been in an institution to begin with, but anyway.
As for the feds infiltrating their little groups, well, the feds are always going to take the ‘path of least resistence’ because they’re lazy and they get paid the same whether they’re working hard at it or sluffing off. They know who the easy targets are, and that’s who they’re going to go after most of the time. Stupid is as stupid does.
I like reading T. Morris comments as much as I like reading the articles here.
Yes and no. We are supposed to be Americans, not order following law worshipers. If we followed the law America, much less the South, would never exist. Our own founders stated often that the law is often nothing more than the will of tyrants, and that’s the truth.
Not that I agree with these clowns in any way, but your borderline worship of the law in your article is kind of disturbing, and if I am being honest is the biggest turn off to young people when they consider things we say.
The law is trash, top to bottom. I see it, the kids see it, everyone sees it. When the Marxists come to them and say they are the answer to the corrupt law and cops they jump at it, because those things are trash, as is the gulag system and most Judges. Everyone sees it. We cannot defend it, to do so is to turn away any young person that is considering our words. Do not defend the indefensible, that does not only include these people, but it includes the governer and the laws she writes and enforces at gunpoint. Neither is worthy of respect and I see too many on our side treating the Law and LEOs like the second coming instead of the diresion it deserves. That was the boomers fatal flaw that lead to the militarized police and the gulag system and it will be ours too if we defend it.
Just because its the law does not mean it should be respected and everyone in prison does not belong there, in fact that’s where most men with the balls to fight end up, its purposely done to them to give us a society ran by cucks, as it is now. If you live today and have never broken the law, then something is seriously wrong with you. Do not defend the indefensible, that includes the law as well as these individuals.
Agreed, we should all write articles praising yankees who try to kidnap and make martyrs for the far left. We will not end up in prison or worse and the secession wagon will fill up with thousands of awoken Dixian souls. Can I get an amen?
There is a distinction between submission to the law and boot licking. We will submit to Law and Order as St. Paul tells us, but if it is just. The laws against kidnapping women from their homes is a very, very just law. Besides, if he had succeeded all he would have done is give the left a cause to cry for in further subjecting us, and acellerationism isn’t good.
I can see where you’re coming from and appreciate you taking the time to write a response that lays out a coherent thought. You’re right that not every law is just and not everyone in jail should be there. You’re also right that the rulers of Michigan and several other States are reprehensible dictators. I would also agree that not all law enforcement personnel are shining paragons of virtue.
That being said, I think you misinterpret what I said about the law. I was not worshiping the law, I was recognizing it for what it is. As it stands, the law is the framework we must function in. A law that is unjust is still one that will be enforced and can get the breaker of said unjust law sent to jail. Those men you brought up who are sitting in jail for immoral reasons are still sitting there. They are still not supporting their families if they have families. They are not meeting a good woman and starting a family if they don’t have one.
I do not defend the indefensible, I recognize the power of the state and it’s complete lack of concern for what I object to on moral grounds. I would not encourage anyone to become a criminal, much less a murderer. This fight for Dixie’s survival will not be won by killing a governor or even several governors. It will be one by building families and culture.
Your comment seems to indicate you want people to break the law and you seem to be encouraging people to do so. This is the textbook definition of “fedposting” and while I am not accusing you of being a fed, I would encourage you to rethink your stance and the damage you are asking other people to do to themselves.