When veteran pornstar Brandi Love isn’t starring in such classics as Mandingo Massacre 14, Incestuous, or This Ain’t Game Of Thrones XXX, she’s taken up being a voice in the “conservative” movement. Recently, she wrote an article for the Neo-Conservative website The Federalist in response to an article from The American Conservative. In the article, Brandi defends subscription porn site OnlyFans and attacks conservatives that do not support pornography, using the First Amendment as her shield. It should come as no surprise that a NeoCon website is not only defending mattress actresses, but publishing one as well.
The article is a lot to digest, especially where she claims to be both a conservative and a Christian while acting in complete opposition to the values of both. While I agree with her that living in an Islamic Caliphate isn’t a better alternative to living in a world with pornography, I can’t sit idly by while she attempts to reconstruct what it is to be a conservative and Christian.
I am both a conservative and a Christian. I am not, however, a zealot. I have travelled all over the United States meeting fans for more than 15 years. There are millions. My fan base is now, and has always been, what I like to refer to as Sex, Drink, and Rock ‘n Roll conservatives.
Brandi Love
My members are a direct reflection of me: Constitutional, red state, Second Amendment-supporting pro-lifers who support our troops and our rights to free speech. We love God and our flag but generally dislike organized religion. We like to hang out on the deck drinking a beer, talking sports, listening to country, rock, and rap while using colorful words to describe Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer, and Anthony Fauci.
The thing about the average conservative is that they’ll say they support the U.S. Constitution, but they’re only familiar with the 1st and 2nd Amendment. It must be said that there is nothing specifically conservative or rightwing about supporting either of those Amendments, and both sides of the political spectrum like to pick and choose when and how it applies. The Left will quickly say that hate speech is not free speech, while the Right will say that burning the U.S. flag should not fall under freedom of expression. On gun rights, we’ve seen a rise in Far Left activists who support the right to own firearms in the form of groups such as The John Brown Gun Club and Redneck Revolt. In fact, Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels specifically said, “Under no pretext should arms and ammunition be surrendered; any attempt to disarm the workers must be frustrated, by force if necessary,” in their Address of the Central Committee to the Communist League. These are no more conservative values than hanging out, drinking beer, talking sports, listening to a wide variety of music, and using colorful words to describe largely disliked politicians. Being pro-life is really the only conservative value she listed.
But what about their love for God? What love for God? Their disliking of organized religion is a safe way of saying they oppose churches. You cannot love God while standing in opposition of His House. Furthermore, their actions are in complete opposition of His teachings. Brandi continues to have sex outside of marriage for money, not only is this adultery but also prostitution. She has also used religious iconography and apparel in her adult videos and photography, which is blatantly sacrilegious. As for her fans, Matthew 5:28 makes it very clear that consuming pornography is in opposition to Christian beliefs. “So when a conservative publication runs an article wishing for an Islamic caliphate because of OnlyFans and its people…it pushes us further away from Christian political conservatism.” As if pornography brings us closer to Christian political conservatism.
It should come as no surprise that an adult film star is making waves in the conservative sphere as it shifts ever so progressively towards the Left. In her article, she even details how OnlyFans is a “financial and emotional oasis” to make it more appealing to the average conservative in these times of strife and uncertainty. In reality, these women of ill repute are just selling their nudes. She’s not the first pornstar to come out as a conservative: Kenna James, Anna Bell Peaks, Jenna Jameson, and countless others have all also come out in support of Donald Trump and consider themselves conservatives, and they certainly won’t be the last. Conservatives should be wary of these Porno-Conservatives entering their circles, as they will attempt to normalize their degeneracy and open the door for more degenerate figures to come in and subvert.
Crawling out of the Everglades and guzzling a Monster energy drink.
The only real Conservatism that exists in the formerly United States, is of the Southern variety. Southern Nationalism is the only real Alternative Right opposition.
The so-called Left and Right only exist in the Northern cultural-political paradigm. For us, they barely even exist at all, unless they’re attacking the South and her people.
What and why should we care about “conservatism” in Boston, New York and Chicago, or in the oddly named and defined “Midwest?”
This woman an her kind just represent the internal cultural-social-political wranglings of a Nation and people foreign to the South, and to us.
The porno-conservative thing seems rather natural. Hooking is incredibly trad as the time honored way for women outside of a man’s household to get by. Sex work not nursing, marketing, or any sort of office based sit and get fat gig; is the traditional labor of independent young women.
Since the 1990’s porn has been increasingly less lucrative for the girls who now have to work more and do more extreme things to get noticed. In spite of that porn and sex work seem to be increasingly attractive compared to the alternative because of the poverty of men.
As the world becomes increasingly complex the Matriarchy’s reaction has been to shelter boys from the bumps and challenges of life making it increasingly rare for boys to mature into men. The lack of strong independent men building households and workshops leaves young women with the choice between working their sex, attaching to a loser male, or trying their best to attach to the increasingly rare man at lottery ticket odds. Then there’s the case where they fail as women and morph into careerist cat lady concern trolls bent on wrecking the society that couldn’t deliver them satisfaction. Attaching to loser boys isn’t an actual option and the odds of attaching to a good man appear increasingly dismal. This reduces the paths open to two. Young women can either throw themselves into porn and sex work, or they can walk the sad path of the sterile shrew.
This may not be the world we want, but this is the world we have. Big porn isn’t much of a thing anymore and it may actually be vulnerable with its slim margins, but breaking the appeal porn and sex work present to young women isn’t going to happen. The only avenue to counter it is promoting an environment where boys just might be able to take their lumps and grow into men.
A paradise of chaste Christian maidens isn’t happening, and I have my doubts such a thing ever truly existed. Even in the Islamic theocracies, sex work is common and recreational homosex appears to persist even in Taliban lands. The Yankee strain of puritanism and its insistence on policing sex behavior seems to have placed a substantial handicap on Christianity north of the Rio Grande. The line just doesn’t seem defensible. A more defensible line may be embracing “Beloved sinners, may they find redemption in this life” in a clear rejection of the Puritan and doubling down on the evangelical doctrine of potential rebirth in Christ.
On nearly every issue except building the city of God on earth, the working girls exposed to the realities of doing business are in an environment that pushes them towards supporting smaller, saner government friendly to small business. The derealized cat ladies stuck in a terminal shit testing spiral while they do sit down make work will never be allies on anything, and they will continue clucking their way to a Yankee police state as the Chicoms increasingly take over. In the extreme optimist case a thot/Trad alliance may help to put a check on the greater degeneracies as Trannies, etc. are perceived competition and certain types of scenes with high risk partners may be made to require hazard pay for the girls that Big Porn increasingly lacks the pockets to pay for.
This seems to be the rare situation where the actual choices are two: embrace thots or surrender to cat lady tyranny. The alternatives, however principled, effectively end up supporting cat lady tyranny.
so force the “working” girls to either be subsidized by their family, husband, or their church community. heck, give out welfare only to families, and see women stick to them. anything to prevent both women and men from shattering their ability to have intimacy.
besides, the “working” girls would rather ally with the catladies and the trannies than with trads. the “working” girls tend to be bisexual at minimum, and are sexually into both catladies and trannies. these failed catladies always existed mind you, just like the soyboys and the “working” girls and the simps and alphabet soup types – the thing is, they were kept in check by traditional values (ex. monasteries), because without keeping them in check they ally and multiply and subvert. the catladies naturally believe in women doing anything to upstage men, and are not going to stop “working” girls from working even if their men are stolen – they ideally hope to ever be financially “blessed” as well, and are the types that would always trust their bff about anything over their man. the “working” girls give back the favor by promoting infidelity, sodomy, interracial relationships, and more, but never that boring monogamy with that awful husband the catladies detest. trannies have likewise gotten massively into porn, and they star alongside many of the so called “conservative pornstars”, usually in many interracial films – because there’s no shortage of black “male talents” and producers enthralled with them…
besides, most thots are not even into small government, which isn’t always a traditional value anyway. in fact most pornstars tended to support Bernie or Warren, several being outright socialist and even satanist. those few thots who seem to appeal to “conservative values” usually only tote guns and “freedom of speech” to get conservatives to buy their “goods”. true, some of these thots may be culturally conservative, sometimes even Southern; but for example most of their motivation behind opposing being registered as “sex workers” is in reality an attempt to try to keep their client list private and/or their taxes from going higher, not any complaints about “big government”. (and again, not all high taxes are wrong: if a high tax can be applied only to certain inevitable vices to discourage them, as well as to help addicts, maybe it would be consonant with traditional values to apply it).
at best, the thots tend to complain about the cephalization of the porn industry by the streaming services, and how they are not independent from the creepy agents and all – which of course they aren’t. they depend on providing a “service” like orgasmic relief with a widely elastic price point, while competing with tons of other orgasmic-relief producers with only few channels of distribution. in short, thots are like artists, and they thus cannot be truly independent if they want to make a living; but need either to be massively popular among many small donors, or be beholden to few big wealthy patrons. onlyfans is not an escape from this, it’s just another subscription site, another system of control – like going from cable to netflix. ergo, while Yankee Puritanism is sterile and counterproductive, it doesn’t mean the prostitution system will change by laissez-faire inaction; it won’t, it will just change channels to keep growing. thus, you can only heavily regulate it and slow it down as much as possible.
yes, breaking the big porn trust and decentralization would help, but because they encourage women to do something else, as really only the elite/nympho escorts will want to work in a smaller industry. and continuing this decelerationist line of thought, some prohibitionist regulations as simple as putting streaming content behind a log-in would also help. men raised in the nudie-mag era seem to have tried harder to get laid, don’t you think? in fact, you had to be a special kind of weirdo to go to the nudie theater.
besides, south of the Rio Grande, prostitution wasn’t always legal, and when it did become legal in the 20th century it was not the universal boon some may make it out to be. sure, there was lowering of population, but specially so among the whiter upper and middle classes whose productivity and fertility were lowered by better access to prostitutes; and not so much among the poor browns, several of whom were related to these prostitutes, thus encouraging further breeding of browns at the expense of whites. additionally, the preferred “registered at a pleasure-house” model of legal prostitution means that the girls depend on the pimps anyway, who will underpay the cheap/average ones that will cater to the lowest common denominator (think the ugliest Mexican lawnmower you ever saw, times 10), while the top talent will attempt to be scabs and work privately from their home for more money from elite clients (usually castizo Hispanics, who ruin their marriages often). if you make independent prostitution legal, you will get the complain from the unionized average-looking sex workers that want to make as much as the elite independent escorts; same reason why there’s current infighting between the commie and the libertarian wings among pornstars here as well. on top of that there’s the cancer of mainstream feminism and whore-worship from Hollywood, which results in ever more girls entering this part of the “work”force at all levels; and thus you have a lot of issues that helped turn Latin America more dysfunctional than what it was even when it was poorer. in short, i don’t think legal prostitution would thus be good for Anglo-America, specially considering how expensive some American women think they are here, and how the trade would inevitably be dominated by colored and socialist factions. besides, the Dutch Reformed haven’t precisely filled the pews in the Netherlands after legal prostitution was allowed there in the infamous Amsterdam red-light district…
i will say, some of these thots do seem to feel legit guilty, specially about abortion, as it seems common in their line of work. besides, as stated above, the Yankee vain desire to flee any temptation is counterproductive due to its pridefulness, so i understand the literally tempting appeal of “conservative pornstars” if the husbands watching them are stuck with overzealous Puritan women. however, it is doubly vain when this husband tends to justify their consequent falling to temptation with these “conservative pornstars” with the prosperity gospel (“porn is just another acting job”), which is what you seem to be doing now.
The simp is immunized against all dangers, one may call him a scoundrel, parasite, cuckhold, degenerate, it all runs of him like water off a raincoat. But call him a simp and you will be astonished at how he recoils, how injured he is, how he suddenly shrinks back: ‘I’ve been found out.