The Last Quasi-Honest Election

Got talking yesterday with someone who came to see us and the topic of the sour condition of the country naturally came up. With thinking people, how could it not, and we both shared the same less than positive outlook.

The Deep State will move heaven and earth, if possible, to prevent Trump from being able to run again, whether it is via fake indictments or whatever they can come up with. The sleaze content of what they come up with makes no difference whatsoever and that is because they are totally amoral. Wrong to them is whatever they are opposed to, and right to them is whatever they endorse.

They will strive also to prevent RFK Jr. from giving Biden any competition among Democrats because they want a Biden, or some political animal akin to him, as president forever. That way they can continue to sell the country out for whatever they can get out of it – and the Bidens have shown us just how profitable that can be – a lesson not lost on the rest. They believe loyalty to your country is the position of fools and they plan to show us just how smart they are as they drag us into some sort of world government we don’t want but they plan to force on us anyway in their infinite “wisdom.”

As far as elections go, we had the last quasi-honest one in 2016 – the one Hillary claimed was “illegitimate.” It was only illegitimate because she didn’t win, and she was supposed to. The Democrats didn’t work hard enough to steal it, nor did they display enough political imagination to steal it – a situation they remedied four years later. By 2020, they had perfected the ability to abscond with an election and with help from the RINOs among them who hated Trump’s guts, they pulled it off.

I noticed that one of the things the Left is trying to criminalize is the First Amendment right to question the results of an election. This is one thing they are charging Trump with, among a myriad of other supposed crimes. If questioning election results is a crime, how come Hillary hasn’t been charged with questioning the results of the 2016 election – especially since her campaign promoted and paid for the phony “Russian dossier” they tried to tar Trump with? And why hasn’t Stacey Abrams in Georgia been charged with questioning the results of the last two elections she lost? You know why. Our politicized two-tiered system of “justice” allows certain people with the proper political connections to say and do whatever they want with no consequences whatever, while their opponents are arrested for the same crimes – guilty or not. And they tell us that all this works toward “preserving our democracy.” It may preserve “their” democracy, but it destroys truly representative government – but then, that’s really been their aim all along.

As to who “wins” the 2024 election, I’m sure Biden will “win” with the most votes for any president ever, even though he does little or no campaigning and when he “wins” he will continue his present campaign to sell the country down the river, as long as there’s a profit in doing so. Besides, it’s what the Deep State wants him to do. They couldn’t care less if he makes some questionable profit along the way as long as he fulfils their agenda, but if he ever gets to a point where, for some reason, he fails to do what they want, he will be gone quicker than Johnny-be-hung and they will find some way to “Watergate” him, just like they did with Nixon when he began having delusions that he was the real president.

You’re okay with the Deep State as long as you do what they want done and you can pretty much do whatever you want, legal or illegal, and you will have immunity. Look at all the things Hillary has done with no consequences, not even the proverbial slap on the wrist. In this life, she’s immune to prosecution – unless she somehow does something that ticks the powers that be off, and so far, she’s managed to avoid that. But in the next life there will be a judgement and that one she won’t be able to buy or lie her way out of.

Although I’d love to be wrong, I look for a Biden “victory” in 2024, or a “victory” for whatever surrogate apparatchik the Deep State puts in his place if, for some reason, he can’t get into the starting gate. As long as he or she does the bidding of the Deep State, they don’t care if they are Democrat, Republican, communist, fascist or whatever. All they need to do is be willing, if they haven’t already done so, to sell their soul to the devil, and then promote the Deep State agenda in all the relevant areas – education, politics, theology, finance, the media, etc. The Deep State Democrats have perfected a way to make sure they never lose another election, unless, for appearances sake, they lose it to a Deep State Republican. So, be prepared for the increasing, police state banana republic of 1984, which will “preserve our democracy” forever – so they think!

-By Al Benson Jr.

7 comments

  1. We’ve never had a single, honest election, not even a quasi one. Never. Not one, ever. It’s all Kabuki theater, to give the illusion of choice. To think that Trump and RFK, Jr. are not just actors following their assigned scripts in this play is tantamount to burying your head in the sand. And let’s stop using their nebulous terminology of “Deep State,” like it’s some dark, shadowy group that no one can pinpoint their true identities. Let’s call them by name: the central bankers. They call the shots, and all politicians are merely their mindless puppets. D or R is meaningless, they are two cheeks on the same ass.

    1. You probably know that you and I are pretty much in agreement Johnny Doe, and certainly one can trace the influence of international finance even to colonial days. Nesta Webster’s books are good source material for exposing the subversive elements at work even during this nation’s founding: Adam Weishaupt. Illuminati. 1776. That said, we might concede that elections may have at one time merely been ‘influenced’, whereas now, (and for quite a long time), there’s complete control over both appointings and outcomes.

    2. I second German Confederate regarding Nesta Webster’s books, and concur with his assertion in his closing sentence. Relevant:

      That popular suffrage does not now really govern this country, that it is notoriously a marketable commodity, that the United States have really ceased already to be what they pretend, a federation of republican States, no clear sighted man doubts. Under a thin veil of radical democracy, the government has already become an oligarchy. Are not State conventions traded off by the magnates as openly as blocks of railroad bonds? Are not legislatures bought as really and almost as openly as cargoes of corn? Are not “corners” made in politics by which the weaker capitalists are sold out, as really as in the pork market?

      It is Washington or Wall street which really dictates what platforms shall be set forth, and what candidates elected and what appointments made, not the people of the States. Some of you may have heard of the incident which happened in our neighboring town, in that year when our Southern conservatives, in their wisdom, made Horace Greeley their standard-bearer, hoping, it seems, like the superstitious Jews, to “cast out devils through Beelzebub, the chief of the devils”; to retrieve the cause of order and right through the arch incendiary and agitator of the country. Several hopeful souls were arguing his success from the many signs of his acceptance with the people. It was said, whole radical towns, whole Union Leagues in the northwest were coming over to Greeley. A sagacious banker standing by quietly shook his head. Our friends, almost vexed at his skepticism, asked: “Why? do not all these accessions, with the Southern support, promise him success?” His answer was: “Gentlemen, I do business in Wall Street, and Wall Street does not want Greeley.” And so the country did not have Greeley, and Greeley did not have the presidency he coveted, but went aside to die of chagrin.

      So Wall Street saw in the third term imperialism thinly masked, and as its oligarchs preferred to be masters themselves, rather than have Grant their master and ours. Wall Street sent to Chicago and nominated Garfield as its convenient lay-figure. But having carried its main point it really cared very little about the choice between him and Hancock, and for a time did not trouble itself. So the people were about to elect Hancock. But one fine morning this simple minded “beefeater” perpetrated the faux pas of endorsing the greenback victory in Maine. And now that Wall Street saw that the Hancock regime was committed to “soft money,” it did trouble itself, and woke up and put its hand to the canvass. It would none of Hancock and his soft money, and so the people could not have Hancock nor he have the presidency.

      -R.L. Dabney, The New South, 1882

      I will only add that, for my part, all this talk and analysis of American elections by my dissident brothers and sisters serves as nothing but a distraction and a nuisance. I care nothing about it because I already know there is not a hair’s breadth of difference between the Rs and the Ds (differences in their party rhetoric notwithstanding), nor between those individuals of any designation TPTB select at every election season as their chosen participants and champions of the causes and their advocates they purposely agitate against each other to perpetuate their long-held strategy of success called, ‘divide and conquer.’ …

      1. Dabney FOREsaw the 2008 Wall Street bailout ‘Inside Job’. So many of us see it happening in real time and yet our ‘blindness remains’. Great quote, sir!

  2. I’ve read a couple of Nesta Webster’s books and have no problem with what she says about the Illuminati. I might ask the question–does the Illuminati or some variant or descendant of it still exist today? How about the Council o Foreign Relations, which is a group that wants us to become part of a one world government? Whether you call them the deep state or international bankers, it’s often many of the same people pulling the strings from in back of the curtain.

    1. The Council on Foreign Relations doesn’t want us to become part of a one world government. We already are. You’re right that it’s the same people pulling the strings from in back of the curtain. It’s the same people who in the first century were trying to stamp out Christ’s followers.

      “I do not have competence to speak of the certainly numerous roots and moving motives of World War 1, but one root seems undeniable to me: the world conspiracy systematically directed by vast Jewish money, covered by secret organizations, and using satanically-cleverly the national aspirations of the folks for the consolidation of a supra-governmental world kingdom.” p. 116.

      Alfred Rosenberg, ‘The Jews’ Trail through the Ages’

      (I’ve read that freemasonry was had its origins in 43 A.D — the original name of the ideology was ‘The Mysterious Force’ — and was begun with the purpose of stamping out Christianity).

  3. Liberal Democracy is nether truly liberal or truly democratic. In reality it is a moneyed anti-White oligarchy. When the Southland Confederation becomes a reality and writes its constitution, I hope it will look toward Switzerland, one of the few Confederations left in the world, whereby the people can vote in national referendums and even craft citizen initiatives and submit it to the government which may be converted in a referendum whereby the people directly vote on. I was highly impressed when I visited. Their system works ours does not!

Comments are closed.