Is America Intrinsically Racist?

Based on the rhetoric of our modern ruling class, the greatest threat to the United States and the American people are evil White Supremacists lurking in the shadows of society.  Yet, America was built by White Supremacists.  Neither Thomas Jefferson nor John Adams considered blacks, or especially African societies, equal to that of White/European peoples or societies.  In fact, at the time of our founding, the United States was founded by men who likely embraced hierarchies within the White race, preferring Anglo-Saxons to those of Mediterranean or Gaelic persuasions; they only tolerated the Scottish due to their abundance in the Western reaches of the colonies. 

The silly notion that our Founding Fathers did not see race is a modern fantasy, peddled by individuals who fear the label of “racist” more than the truth.  None of these men would support the intermarriage of the races.  Most did not support the voting enfranchisement of non-Whites, including such luminaries as Benjamin Franklin (Franklin even hated the “swarthy” Germans).  Thus, it seems odd to consider White Supremacists the greatest threat to a Republic that was founded by White Supremacists.

All of this leads to an obvious question that should be addressed: is the United States Intrinsically racist? Answer: Of course, it is. 

But does a “racist” United States mean that it is “bad?”  The answer is, “No.”  Just as the Chinese or Japanese would enjoy “Asian Privilege” in a country designed by Asian norms, and Africans would enjoy “African Privilege” in a country designed by African norms, it makes sense that Whites would enjoy “White Privilege” in a country predicated on European (i.e., White) norms.  The fact is, race is a genetic fact and the influencing constructs of race define the societies within which we develop.  Alien DNAs to a given society – such as, Whites in Japan, or Africans in Malaysia – will find the societies challenging at best.  More likely, they will be prone to engage in behaviors that offend the host genetic population and consequently, find themselves in trouble. 

This takes us back to the White Supremacist “threat.”  If the media and politicians are to be believed, White fiends prey upon innocent Asians, Hispanics, Jews, and blacks.  Of course, statistically, the claim is laughable.  The most violent demographic cohort in the country are black males between the ages of 18-34 years old.  Despite being only 3% of the population, that demographic group accounts for almost half a million violent crimes annually, including 56% of all murders and 100% of all interracial White-black rapes.  Whites are largely docile because they live in a society of their genetic mapping, while simultaneously being depicted as the enemy in modern society.  Unfortunately, Whites, unlike Asians and Africans, designed a governance system within which most of these aliens can thrive.  The only logical reason to explain why blacks are so exceedingly violent and generally fail despite extraordinary social benefits, while another alien genetic type, Asians, thrive in this White privileged United States without those same benefits, is that Africans are genetically incompatible with advanced society.

Still, they should at least consider building systems more suited to their primitive nature in their homeland, Africa, where the absence of White society may allow them to thrive in a culture of their own making and “privilege.”  If systemic racism is the reason blacks are prone to commit exceeding levels of brutal violence in White societies, should they not seek a more peaceful, long term solution – separation?  Whereas I believe their genetics are the real reason for savage black behavior, that defies Marxist concepts on societal transformation.  Therefore, it would be logical to carve out an independent black path of existence.  Whereas some blacks thrive in advanced White societies, they generally thrive in an industry committed to entertaining White people – e.g., music, athletics, and acting.  On average, however, blacks fail miserably in White societies.  This leads back to the same question.

If blacks fail in White societies, are White societies racist – or more poignantly – is America intrinsically racist?  The answer, again, is, “Yes.” 

The United States is the construct of centuries of White social, political, and cultural maturity.  A product of the Age of Enlightenment, the United States was designed for individual Europeans to thrive.  The very foundational principle of the American creation was that of the ability of the individual to achieve his maximum best when unencumbered by oppressive or arbitrary government.  Consequently, our entire American system is designed to free an individual’s potential.  This freedom comes with a social contract, by which the individual is expected to act in ways that better his locality and improve upon that which he was given.  No such system exists anywhere else in the world.

Before I go further, it is important to address an issue that Constitutional conservatives and “normiecons” reject: the idea that the Constitution and the American system is racist.  They do so because they have been trained to abhor racism.  They simply hear “racism” and immediately believe it is a condemnation of all they hold sacrosanct.  In part, I do not blame them.  Calling American principles and institutions “racist” is often the opening salvo by Marxists seeking to change that system.  I am not coming from that perspective.  Rather, I am happy that we have a racist system and it is one that should be utilized more efficiently to the benefit of our people.  After all, when the U.S. was founded, blacks were enslaved (counted as three-fifths a person), women did not enjoy the right to vote, and there were no Asians present at the Constitutional Convention.  It is clear the Founding Fathers sought to establish a new Nation-State predicated on European principles, and more specifically, Anglo-Saxon values. 

The years in which White Male Dominance was codified in society were the most productive in American history.

Secondly, it is also important to address another issue: the Marxist origins of the term racist.  Many on the Dissident Right like to point out that the term racist has its weaponized origins from Judeo-Bolshevik circles.  They are not wrong.  However, the term itself is not a bad thing.  It is made a bad thing when one implies racism underlies exclusionary and violent behaviors set to harm a different race.  But racist – at its core root – simply means someone who values their race over others.  

Do we not value our own over others?  Is that not natural?  Have we seen any evidence by which non-White societies benefit Whites more than others?  Genuine Constitutional Conservatives should explore the obvious answers to these simple questions. 

When Marxists and members of the normie political Right use the term “racist” to demean someone or, in the case of the American political structure, “something,” they are fighting nature itself.  Of course, I am a racist.  I prefer Whites over all others; I prefer Celtic peoples over non-Celtic peoples within my Caucasian family.  I root for the White guys to win, whether I am watching sports or Family Feud.  I find White women to be the prettiest of all women.  I go to a White church… eat at White restaurants… hang out with White people… I am tribal.  Most people are tribal.  Therefore, when someone shudders at the term “racist,” they are really not rejecting the actual definition of the term; they are rejecting the social consequences of admitting a fact.

This all brings me back to the evident “racist United States.”  Our systems were designed by White men.  They were designed at a time when White men more than ruled the world – they were the known world.  The United States Constitution was designed explicitly for White men to thrive and, by extension, White women, who were their wards.  White men made decisions and voted for the best policies that expanded the opportunities and benefits of other White men.  Just as I do not expect the Han Chinese to consider the impact of their policy prescriptions on Irish-Catholics, nor should we be expected to consider the impact of our policy prescriptions on the Han Chinese.

James Madison was not thinking about his slaves when he made decisions about the Constitution, beyond their voting value for Virginia.  James Polk was not concerned with the feelings of Spanish speaking Mexicans who found themselves on newly purchased Western territories after defeating Mexico.  Benjamin Harrison was under no obligation to consider the plight of the Lakota – they were in the way of White expansion.  No society has ever thought about the impact of their values and norms on alien others. 

Is the United States racist? Yes.  It should be more racist.  Bending over backwards to placate peoples genetically incapable of thriving in our society, blacks, to the detriment of the founding stock, Whites, makes no sense. Why would we embrace systems that fail our people?  We should not.  We should be more like the Israelis – with a take it or leave it proposition regarding the government we designed, regardless of its impact on “others.”