Blood and Soil: How Southerners Became a Separate and Distinct People

Why is there a “South”? What is this place we call the South? What makes it different from other parts of the United States?

Many years ago, the Alabama writer Clarence Cason wrote that the South was “self-conscious enough and sufficiently insulated to be thought of as a separate province.” Echoing the same theme, W.J. Cash called the South, “not quite a nation within a nation, but the next thing to it.” In his book The American Dilemma, the Swedish sociologist Gunnar Myrdal agreed that the South was “a nation within a nation.” The historian Ulrich B. Phillips once quipped about a ferryman calling the north bank of the Ohio River “the American shore.”

Continue reading

Sexual Utopia in Power


It is well known to readers of this journal that white birthrates worldwide have suffered a catastrophic decline in recent decades. During this same period, ours has become assuredly the most sex-obsessed society in the history of the world. Two such massive, concurrent trends are hardly likely to be unrelated. Many well-meaning conservatives agree in deploring the present situation, but do not agree in describing that situation or how it arose. Correct diagnosis is the first precondition for effective strategy.

Continue reading

Religion & Demographics

The first shall be from: Jones, Robert P. (2016-07-12). The End of White Christian America. Simon & Schuster. Kindle Edition. The author is our enemy. The main premise of the book is to count invaders as Americans without ever talking about the invasion. Even with knowledge of the Invasion, there are still things to learn from the data that the author gloats over.

“Earlier and steeper declines among white mainline Protestants, followed by later significant declines among white evangelical Protestants. Using the General Social Survey to measure retention rates for each group, Putnam and Campbell found that mainline Protestant retention rates began to fall among people who came of age between 1920 and 1960, stabilizing at about 60– 65 percent. In other words, as they put it, “for the last half century roughly one-third of the people raised in one of the mainline Protestant denominations has left the faith, mostly to become evangelical or none.”

White evangelical Protestants, by contrast, retained approximately three quarters of their children for most of the twentieth century. However, among those who came of age in the 2000s, the retention rate plunged to 62 percent, a number comparable to that of their mainline cousins.”

Continue reading