It is time for the white nationalist movement in its various forms to stop calling ourselves “conservatives“.
We are fundamentally a right wing movement, but despite some philosophical capital being invested in the pro-traditionalist message, we must accept that traditional values and culture are no longer sacred institutions in western societies. The Rubicon was crossed when sodomy was legally equated with legitimate heterosexual marriage. Once our society codified this degeneracy it ceased to be counter-cultural and had become, in fact, the status quo. Indeed, every other cultural institution was surrendered long ago. So what exactly are we “conserving” at this point?
Let’s go over a list of American and European institutions (that matter) and determine which ones, if any, have retained their traditional values or seek to uphold such values.
2. Educational Institutions
Since the six institutions I’ve listed are all (more or less) subordinate to the state, I won’t go into detail about how the state no longer exists as a traditional institution. After all, the dismantling of these institutions is, in fact, symptomatic of our rule of law being usurped by (((Marxists/Globalists))).
Also, we must define what the term “traditional values” means in a logical and consistent way. For the sake of discussion, we will define traditional values as those values that serve to protect, foster, and preserve the spiritual, social, and economic needs of the families, the communities, and the people from which those traditions are derived. By this definition, our Eurocentric institutions were derived from white people and are meant to serve white people. They are meant to serve the interests of our people’s children – today, tomorrow, and for their posterity. If our institutions fail at this, they are no longer worthy of conservation. In fact, they are institutions to be revolted against, dismantled, and replaced.
Perhaps the most obviously subverted institution is the mass media or MSM. Our newspaper, television, film, music, and other entertainment industries are mechanisms of leftist propaganda. Sometimes the indoctrination is subtle. Sometimes, not so much. And sometimes, such as is the case with Fox News Network, the message is just palatable enough for those who think of themselves as “conservative” that they are subdued and lulled into a sense of complacency. One thing is clear; in western societies there are no media platforms granted to right wing philosophy or activism. This is true even in the United States where “free speech” is constitutionally protected. While not explicitly criminal under the law, most true right wing concerns are labeled as “hate speech” and disallowed by the globalist corporate establishment that owns the MSM. (There is plenty of evidence of Jewish nepotism and tribalism in the media as evidenced by who owns and works for these conglomerates.) But we must come to terms with the fact that leftists within our own tribe are willing enablers and subverters as well.
If a successful revolution is to be undertaken, the dismantlement and retaking of media institutions must be the first priority. It is no coincidence that the nationalist consciousness has been awakened in recent years by the proliferation of social and alternative media on the internet. The right to communicate freely through that medium must be protected at all costs.
Much has been written about leftist subversion of Academia. Clearly, cultural Marxists such as (((Max Horkheimer))) and (((Theodor Adorno))) in the post-war era were successful in instigating a counter-cultural revolution that infiltrated our educational institutions. While they focused their efforts on college campuses, the product of their efforts has carried on through subsequent generations in our primary and secondary public schools. Any parent with a school aged child in the “current year” can attest that subtle subversive ideas are forced on our children – even in the most homogeneous white middle class school districts. Feminism, multiculturalism, hyper-individualism and sexual liberalism: these values are taught, even if indirectly and unwittingly, by the well meaning, mostly white, middle class, suburbanite, and more often than not, Christian, women of our society.
The teaching profession, as it applies to the formative years of our children’s lives, attracts the nurturing instincts of women. This is only natural in a homogeneous and high trust society, but it is catastrophic in liberal democratic societies that have adopted multiculturalism. Young boys and girls have a frightfully anemic level of exposure to men outside of their immediate family. Masculine virtues are not adequately nurtured among young boys (through mentoring and example) and young girls are woefully lacking in male figures to hold in esteem. Yet, it is in their nature to seek out heroes and, in their stead, the media creates pop cultural surrogates to fill the vacuum. This is a toxic condition that our academic and media institutions have created, be it concerted or not. The halls of academia must be retaken, again at all costs.
One might be fooled into believing that our military is a sacred institution that is impervious to subversion. In a sense, it is the last bastion of masculine honor and virtue, but in that way it serves as a useful tool of subversion, instead of a barrier against it. Foolhardy men who call themselves “patriots” sign up for military service, but they know not who they really serve. Western militaries are no longer defenders of people or conquerors of lands. They are enforcers of globalist initiatives designed to deracinate all peoples, including the people they purportedly serve. For the sake of discussion we can include all agencies of domestic law enforcement as well. A cycle of destabilization of 3rd world dissenters to the globalist schemes, a crisis created, hostile refugees, migrations into western lands, and domestic enforcement of peaceable assimilation and acceptance of the “new world order.”
Again, like our primary and secondary educators, I do not believe that most of our military personnel are willingly participating in the machinery of their own displacement. They are simply employees of the state and their economic interests dictate subservience to the state. They, in much the same way as educators, have been convinced of the virtue of their work. Indeed, they would willingly guard the gates of Hell if they could be convinced that Hell was, in fact, Heaven and if the pay was good enough. Simply put, in a high trust society of common interests and common goals, a strong, patriotic military is among the most noble of institutions. But in a multicultural capitalist oligarchy overseeing a deracinated society of interchangeable economic units, instead of a nation of homogeneous people, the military is a tool of destruction and must be revolted against and made subordinate to nationalists at all costs.
Business. Free markets, free trade, consumerism, capitalism, corporatism. It is difficult to criticize these institutions. Capitalism has been overwhelmingly successful at maintaining a high standard of living for westerners. The counter-intuitiveness of this problem is difficult to resolve in even the most analytical of minds. Yet, prosperity has become our Achilles heel. It is the veil behind which our subversion is easily carried out. If quality of life were only measured by how much food is in the refrigerator and the number of consumer gadgets one possesses, then certainly western society could be seen as a utopia. I’m afraid, sadly, that this is precisely the yardstick by which people measure their happiness and with little regard for other concerns.
Western society is a soulless culture of meaningless economic transactions. Even our love lives have been reduced to what amounts to a produce or meat market. Relationships are disposable. Divorce rates are obscene. Dating has become an exercise in checklist validation. Look at online dating profiles. They more closely resemble an advertisement for a used car with a list of “standard features and accessories” for the “buyer” to compare and consider than they do a genuine appeal at finding companionship. It’s quite disgusting, really. It has become clear that while no society can function without cooperative economic institutions, our capitalist system has become decadent, bloated, and obscene, and must be retooled to serve our people and families, instead of the globalist oligarchy that has alienated and forsaken us.
Science was never meant to be an institution, but it has certainly become one. Science is supposed to simply be a method by which empirical evidence is obtained, studied, and conclusions are drawn, an ongoing process by which conclusions can be revised or abandoned based on new empirical evidence. There is no morality to science and rarely should conclusions be categorized as “facts” or “truth”. The job of science is not to become a moral authority or hold political power. Its purpose is singular. To provide useful and objective data by which conclusions can be drawn and decisions made – sometimes by those who hold the power and authority in society. That is a necessary but extremely dangerous evil. For in our time, power is held by globalists, and science has been politicized to serve their agenda.
Science has never been untainted by human nature. However, when western society was homogeneous, our institutions had little motivation to bend or manipulate science, and scientists were by-an-large free to pursue their inquiries without bias or interference. Great progress was made, particularly in the 19th century, which set the foundation for the engineering marvels of the 20th century. The 21st century has seen science, globalism, and capitalism merge into one symbiotic system that is driven by political correctness and profit margins, instead of pure non-ideological pursuits. Science must be liberated, and this can only occur through a radical revolution.
(Note: science as an empirical method transcends cultures, nations, and peoples and can, and should, serve all of humanity. Nationalism is an ideology just as globalism. Science should be indifferent to political bias. If this were in practice the case, the sciences of IQ, race, gender, sexuality, and genetics would not be swept under the rug and would be open to rigorous debate and discussion. Instead, because multiculturalism is the guiding principle of western society, all factual discussion of such topics is labeled as “hate speech”).
Discussion of religion in the context of subverted institutions is bound to cause conflict, even within a movement such as ours. I will not go deeply into criticisms of Christianity here. I myself have walked away from the religion of my upbringing because I feel that it has failed my people. Outside of science, the other four institutions that I have discussed, and many other institutions that a long tome could be written about, were supposed to be nurtured, guided, and at least on a spiritual level, led by our common religious traditions. In my opinion, it was a severe error of history that our forefathers sought to separate religion from government. It was a severe error of history that our religious institutions did not assert themselves to prevent their ultimate subversion. Honestly however, I’m not sure that this flaw isn’t inherent in the Christian religion. It is a religion of altruism and universalism, and those weaknesses are in part responsible for the multicultural mess we are in.
Believe me, my heart and mind are conflicted at their core on the current crisis we face and the role that our religious institutions played in creating it. One thing is certain, however. A religion that fails at defending its own core tenants in the face of modernity needs to be evaluated and overhauled by men of integrity. And, if the fatal flaws which undermine it can be fixed, then perhaps Christianity has a future beyond the coming revolution. I’m hopeful, but on a personal note, I’m prepared to move forward with radical change, with or without Christianity.
From the outset of this entry, I stated that we, as white and southern nationalists, and indeed Eurocentric nationalists of all stripes, must abandon the idea that we are attempting to “conserve” our institutions. I’m reminded of great ancient cities such as Troy that was excavated in Turkey by the German father of archaeology, Heinrich Schliemann, in the 1870’s. Many distinct layers of Troy were excavated, each one built upon the ruins of the other. The Trojans did not conserve their rubble when their citadel was destroyed. They simple built upon it anew. We must face the reality that western civilization is already compromised beyond repair. Our future is revolution and our tactics must be radical if we are to succeed. The Left won the culture war because it was dangerous and bold, not conservative and humble (this is why hardly anyone reads the tepid and milquetoast National Review).
There are fragments of our institutions that can be salvaged. We must not allow our history to be forgotten, or worse, rewritten by our enemies. Enough damage has already been done in that regard. We must have a vision for the future. Solutions. Answers. We must be prepared to do this at all costs. At this point, it isn’t just our civilization that we are fighting for. It is the very existence of our people.
We have just begun to fight. Hail Victory.