If you make a habit of counter-signaling “White Sharia”, it is time to educate yourself on the history of the feminist movement. You need look no further than Valerie Solanas, who single-handedly invented the idea of “Feminist Sharia” when she wrote the S.C.U.M. Manifesto, and for that reason she’s regarded as a cult hero among the hardcore left.
Entire gender studies departments at once respectable universities are populated with academics who were influenced by her work. Basic bitch conservatives cite her books when they discuss feminism on their talk shows, and token leftist talking-heads dismiss her influence on the one hand, while admiring and even deifying her on the other (So Brave!). When leftists are challenged to defend her, you can almost hear echoes of an Alt-Right edgelord saying, “It’s just a meme bro!”
Here are some infamous quotes from this seminal work of clap-trap Feminist Sharia:
“The male is a biological accident: the Y (male) gene is an incomplete X (female) gene, that is, it has an incomplete set of chromosomes. In other words, the male is an incomplete female, a walking abortion, aborted at the gene stage. To be male is to be deficient, emotionally limited; maleness is a deficiency disease and males are emotional cripples.
The male is completely egocentric, trapped inside himself, incapable of empathizing or identifying with others, or love, friendship, affection of tenderness. He is a completely isolated unit, incapable of rapport with anyone. His responses are entirely visceral, not cerebral; his intelligence is a mere tool in the services of his drives and needs; he is incapable of mental passion, mental interaction; he can’t relate to anything other than his own physical sensations. He is a half-dead, unresponsive lump, incapable of giving or receiving pleasure or happiness; consequently, he is at best an utter bore, an inoffensive blob, since only those capable of absorption in others can be charming. He is trapped in a twilight zone halfway between humans and apes, and is far worse off than the apes because, unlike the apes, he is capable of a large array of negative feelings — hate, jealousy, contempt, disgust, guilt, shame, doubt — and moreover, he is aware of what he is and what he isn’t.”
“Eaten up with guilt, shame, fears and insecurities and obtaining, if he’s lucky, a barely perceptible physical feeling, the male is, nonetheless, obsessed with screwing; he’ll swim through a river of snot, wade nostril-deep through a mile of vomit, if he thinks there’ll be a friendly pussy awaiting him. He’ll screw a woman he despises, any snaggle-toothed hag, and furthermore, pay for the opportunity. Why? Relieving physical tension isn’t the answer, as masturbation suffices for that. It’s not ego satisfaction; that doesn’t explain screwing corpses and babies.”
“Fatherhood and Mental Illness (fear, cowardice, timidity, humility, insecurity, passivity): Mother wants what’s best for her kids; Daddy only wants what’s best for Daddy, that is peace and quiet, pandering to his delusion of dignity (`respect’), a good reflection on himself (status) and the opportunity to control and manipulate, or, if he’s an `enlightened’ father, to `give guidance’. His daughter, in addition, he wants sexually — he givers her hand in marriage; the other part is for him.”
She further states that men are less than human – machines and walking dildos. The entire book fantasizes a world where alpha men are killed and only the most beta are allowed to live as servants for her fictional “Society for Cutting Up Men.”
The SCUM Manifesto influenced further feminist literature such as the Redstocking Manifesto and undoubtedly countless others. She has been written about admiringly since the 1960’s by thousands of feminist authors, educators and celebrities. Many will casually play down her significance and call the book “satirical” – but scant few soundly reject her and many claim to glean “profound wisdom” from her insane fantasies. By the way, perhaps this “satirist’s” greatest claim to fame is attempting to murder Andy Warhol. Think about that.
Rather than spend a great deal of time on describing the book, I suggest to the reader that you listen to this audio book rendition and take notes.
With that, some thoughts on the White Sharia meme controversy. I confess myself that it makes me uncomfortable. I don’t personally like it or the language required of it. However, what’s good for the goose is good for the gander. “It’s satire.” It really is “just a meme, bro.“
So calm your tits and let it ride.
Why does the S.C.U.M. Manifesto persist? Because it is powerful and edgy and for the feminist mind, it is insightful. If I’m being totally honest, it wouldn’t have held water for this long if there wasn’t a certain amount of truth in it being – “muh truth to power.”
But the White Sharia meme is more powerful because it isn’t clouded with the delusions of feminism. It is grounded in reality (i.e. entirely functioning cultures that successfully implement sharia). White Sharia has historical context in that up until the turn of the 20th century, basically all of human history with the exception of a century long hiccup, it was the way things were. Feminist Sharia can never be anything but satire because it can never be realized in real life.
This is why the White Sharia meme is powerful and why it is the only possible antidote for feminism. Our job is not to convince women that the Alt-Right and traditionalism are for the best. Thinking women (yeah I know, but don’t take the low handing fruit) already understand that feminism is destroying everything good about civilization. Virtuous women (stahp!!) already understand that the nuclear family is the most sanctified institution ever created.
While White Sharia is indeed possible if men unify and collectivize ourselves like feminists do, and while Feminist Sharia requires voluntary submissiveness of men (i.e. an illusion), the beauty of White Sharia is that white men have the self control, intelligence, altruism, and empathy to moderate ourselves.
So quit being pussies.